Yes, this is the point of a boxing forum. To talk about what happened, to debate who won, not to try to monopolize your opinion. That's just juvenile.
Was it only alcohol your mother consumer during pregnancy, or did she smoke a bowl from time to time?
Then you should be the first one to defend Canelo, who continues to be accused of not being a clean fighter while the WADA has made it clear for many many years that meat contamination cases in Mexico do not constitute doping.
That's your opinion. The judges saw it differently. Clen is a substance found in Mexican meat. Canelo is a clean fighter who beat GGG. Once officially, twice if we're being honest about what happened the first time. Are you an honest man?
Bro what's wrong with this kiwi guy? Now he goin after my mama. Did I hurt this guy's feelings or something?
But you know what Canelo did to Plant when he talked bad about Canelo mama? He got counter slapped and his sunglasses flew off. I guess that's what I gotta do to kiwi huh.
I'm a natural born fighter who continues to hone my craft. You may be right about kiwis in general but this kiwi in particular is already coming at me sideways, so for me this presents counter punching opportunities.
Of coarse, 90% of the boxing fans on planet earth agree GGG won the first fight, and the majority think he won the second as well. It's not worth arguing about, its like arguing about Pacquiao vs Bradley 1 with a Delusional Bradley fan.
Those same %s just happen to be the same %s that predicted GGG would beat Canelo prior to each fight. All this is, is the same people who wrongly predicted GGG would beat Canelo or TKO him getting exposed after the fight happened then being unable to admit they were wrong, so their scoring of the match mirrored their prediction, producing the same %s pre-fight as post-fight. Don't make me laugh trying to compare this to Bradley Pacquiao. Pacquiao didn't have any trouble dispatching Bradley in the rematch now did he. On the other, GGG had all kinds of problems in the rematch with Canelo when Canelo gave him what he asked for and came right at him Mexican Style. I don't recall Bradley ever beating Pacquiao up in their rematch like Canelo beat up GGG in that rematch.
GGG fans also predicted he needed a KO to get the win because a robbery was highly likely, GGG clearly got the win on points but unfortunately got robbed of his victory. It went down in history as an infamous robbery that can never be changed, just like the Clenbuterol scandal, some things just leave a scar.
Anybody who predicted GGG would win would naturally claim a robbery occurred as a result of him not winning, as a result of their predictions being proved wrong in the ring. This is a self-fulfilling prophecy. What went down in history was that GGG was unable to beat Canelo in two attempts, despite the overwhelming majority of fans polled predicting that would happen both times. It's awfully convenient for you to "excuse" those who predicted that GGG would TKO Canelo by arguing well. . . they didn't really mean that, they just meant that he would have to KO him since he couldn't win a decision. Every angle of this always comes with one excuse stacked upon another excuse in order to explain away the vast majority of wrong predictions. The great thing about not ever being on the GGG hype machine is that I don't have to spin and twist everything to explain away wrong predictions. I don't have to believe in crazy judging conspiracies to justify my position. Only people who got it so very wrong from the beginning have to do that.