I've said it before and I'll say it again... Brook is one of the few ATGs of this era and is the best out of the seven commanders of the ring(Brook, Ward, Little Vasyl, Guillermo, Frampton, Crawford, and Robeisy Ramirez Carrazana). People like to use this fight as an example to why technicians like Lara, "Poo Poo" Andrade, Julian "lil ward" Williams, and Austin Salmon would beat the Middleweight King. Brook knew he was going to lose, so he went for broke.. slugging it out, throwing combos.. Lara or any of the others wouldn't dare fight golovkin like that. I'd give James degale a good shot at beating the middleweight King.
Then whats Thurman , because he beat Brooks best win better than Brook did. Gstans could be the worst fanboi's of all time.
Or who they lose to. Plenty of fighters have made names for themselves in defeat against another great opponent.
Hahahahahahahahahahahaha......................................! GGGstan logic at its finest. You guys are the dumbest group of boxing fans since the Pacturds. Now one can become an ATG depending on how he loses to someone? O.M. to the mother fakken G.! You guys are useless.
Let's see. Tommy Hearns became very highly thought off after his loss to Leonard. Marquez made a career losing to Pacquiao and only picked up the victory in the 4th fight against a declined Pac. The list can go on and on. Plenty of fighters have become great in defeat.
Wow... this is very sad. Now you're claiming Hearns and Marquez became all time greats for how they lost? You sir DKSAB. To be a ATG, you have to win, simple as that. Losing efforts can increase your marketability, not you ATG standing. U dumb
Your opinion does not make Brook an ATG. Even if you believed that with all your might, how can you claim someone is an ATG based on speculation and opinion.. WTF is wrong with you guys
No he didn't, no he didn't, no he didn't..... Brook chopped porter up all night with onetwos while Thurman was running and getting smashed on.