Golovkin Is a Fraud

Nah. DAZN want this. Murata is solid and a huge star is Japan.
This is an excellent fight. Don't sleep on it. And Andrade just looks good on paper. Go and look at his last few fights, the dude has some serious limitations. He is a better athlete than a boxer.

 

By your logic ranked 51 Dusty Hernandez Harrison, who is 34-0 is better than GGG, Canelo and many others. Right?

P.S. pretty sure its a troll thread from some second account...

 

Spacker lol

 

Jesus
Are you a **** or just that uninformed?

 

Already been beat? Are you a fan boy of just boxers with zero loss records???
Guess you have few boxers you give any credit to in that case—-Sad little boy

 

Murata is no bum and doing this fight.in Japan in December will be a huge event there.

It should be a good battle. I'd love to be there as the atmosphere will be unbelievable. It will be a great show the Japanese put on.

 

GGG is not a Fraud , Murata is not a Bum - whoever said that is a Neanderthal

 

Except for he beat Canelo TWICE and got robbed in politically correct America.

 

Murata is exactly the kind of fight that makes sense for Golovkin. Its a legit challenge against a highly ranked MW that people like me who bash Golovkins opposition relative to the praise he gets have been asking for. I'm not saying Murata is a boogeyman or future HOF. But he's somewhere around the level of "very good." To still complain spills some sort of agenda and I get it, but just sit on your thoughts for a minute and you should have some clarity of likely hypocrisies.

 

A fraud?

Was he a fraud when he faced Canelo twice, and, arguably, beat him both times (even if the corrupt judges say otherwise)?

What about when be beat Jacobs?

Derevyanchenko?

Are they also frauds too, in your eyes?

Listen, there's no question his resume isn't as impressive as it could be, but there's no doubt in my mind GGG was the real deal.

I conceed that, maybe, he isn't that guy anymore.

In his prime he was a very dangerous man, and could it be that he simply couldn't get many opponents because he had such a reputation?

It does happen in boxing.

As for the fighter he is today - well no, he probably isn't the same guy...but age will do that to a man.

A little overrated?

Maybe.

But, a fraud, no way.

 

Sasquatch has put his big foot in it with his OP.

 

I'm gonna give Dubblechin a defence here. For sure he has a blind spot for Wilder - actually I think he knows the reality deep down but is boxed so tightly into a corner he can only come out swinging, which is apt - but on matters other than the Bronzed Bummer he's pretty on point a lot of the time. I read his posts.

Shadow, on the other hand, is merely typing furiously from the infinite ****** cage - eventually something logical comes out amidst his copious keyboard bashing. Mostly though, it's complete nonsense....

 

Lmao I'm not gonna argue with that

 

The only way someone could call Golovkin a fraud is if they are responding to claims that he is among the greatest boxers ever, has a better resume than Monzon/Hagler/Robinson, would beat cruiserweight and HW legends, has the power of Mike Tyson, etc.

Oh. Um. Wait... 10 years of all that BS later. Regurgitated on here by forum stalwarts with no shame the whole time.

Without responding to a claim, it's absurd to call any boxer a fraud. But if responding to an outrageous claim or sentiment on the medium of the internet especially, yeah, you're going to hear people take opposite extremes.