Golovkin: Look at Hopkins; My Record's Much Bigger, Stronger at 160!

Abraham wasn't written off. He lost to two of the best fighters in the sport, there was no shame in that. I don't know why we are talking about Abraham though, he isn't better than Golovkin.

Berto Ramirez is very good, better than Murray at this point. I never said otherwise. Arthur would have lost to him in his prime too (especially at SMW were AA wasn't as effective as he was at MW). Styles make fights, it doesn't mean AA was completely shot.

Eastman is not a better win, arguably beating Sturm and Martinez is better than anything Eastman accomplished in his career.

 

Congrats your hero has yet again pick a guy who is below his division and hasn’t fought in 2 yrs... he’s the boogeyman enjoy the fight Saturday man cause GGG days are numbered. I can’t wait for him to be stripped by the IBF, him and his team ducks Quack Quack Quack

 

Have another whiskey. Maybe it'll help you believe what you say.

 

He says he has me on ignore. So he'll never see it.

Oh, wait ... now you quoted me.

Wow, DKSAB, you sound like a little girl with sand in the vag. I'm sorry I insulted your toy boy Dino. Please don't be upset. Have a lollipop.

 

Looks like somebody bagged hisself a Dino.

 

He wasn't past it what so ever. Very solid fighter in 2011. The Froch fight Froch kept it long and fought the perfect fight

 

Jesus.

Who in the world did Eastman beat? Sam Soliman who was in his 16th professional fight with 4 losses already? He was beaten any time he stepped up. He was a solid fighter but had a padded record until he got a shot at Hopkins, then dropped 3 straight and was never relevant again.

Murray has been on the wrong side of a few decisions. People tend to forget there are only 3 judges. So because 2 or 3 judges think you lost, we should just go to Boxrec and not even bring context into the situation? Murray could very easily have been given the decisions against Sturm, Martinez, and Abraham. He also was effective at SMW.

 

No, those decisions don't count because Martinez was crippled, Sturm was not good, and Abraham was shot. Yet, beating the great Sam Soliman elevates Eastman to being HOF worthy.

Also, the good wins on Eastman's record Murray would have beaten too, probably even easier than Eastman.

 

There is a reason I cited "Soliman being in his 16th pro fight" vs. Eastman being in his 30th. Plenty of guys have losses early on in their career. Soliman was a solid fighter and was undefeated for 4 years until losing to Winky Wright in a competitive fight. That was his prime. Plenty of guys have losses early in their career.

Like I said, Murray has an argument beating Abraham, Martinez, and Sturm. I thought the Martinez fight was a kind of a robbery. But since we aren't providing context here, I would say his best win is either Bursak, Rosado, or Spada.

I know your response will mock those names, but Murray has proven to be a good fighter. I'm not going to count it against him when he fought Martinez in Argentina, Sturm in Germany, and Abraham in Germany. He very well could be a multiple time, multiple weight world champion.