Golovkin tribute thread

Scott Gilford!:hi:

Any front page article's coming out soon?

 

As I said before MVC's job is to stir the sh.t on this forum. He even can't sleep thinking about what sh.ty threads he has to do next day.

:nod

 

[YT]oAKG-kbKeIo[/YT]

 

yeah , Most Virgin C.nt is making a living by baiting posters with his provocative-garbage threads about black fighters. :nod

 

if you are dumb enough to respond in kind you get perma banned. This site works a lot like real life. :-(

 

Hahahah. Great response.

 

:?:roll::shock::roflyep

 

Yeah, I hope he has a scoop and a plastic baggie so he can scoop it up and throw it in the trash can.

 

I think the only time catch weights are appropriate are for two top fighters from different weight divisions to fight in a non-championship fight. Golovkin-Ward in a non-championship fight, it would be appropriate to meet at a catch weight between the divisions. Now if Ward's belt is on the line, it should be at 168, or if GGG's belts are on the line, it should be at 160. I disagree with catch weight fights for titles in a division. I would agree with Kovalev-Ward at 171.5 or whatever, if no belts were on the line, and Golovkin-Ward at 164, if no belts were on the line. I think there is no issue with that. Since Golovkin does bring in higher TV ratings and ticket sales, he'd have an edge on the negotiating leverage. It would be his right to try to get a catch weight, IF Ward's belt wasn't on the line. Of course everything is negotiable and Ward's team could always offer Golovkin more of the money pool to get the fight up to 168. I'd honestly like to see the fight at 168 for Ward's belt. I'd favor Ward in that fight, but GGG's stock would go through the roof if he pulled off the upset.

 

Well yes he obviously did.....

 

How many stay busy fights does GGG needs??????/ atsch

 

No.