Dirrell hasn't fought since Feb 2013 yet to date his resume, and wins is still stronger and better than GGG's. :yep
He hasn't held one which even makes GGG's opposition appear even weaker since he has held a title for 4 years and has faced far weaker opposition than someone who is title-less and in limbo for the last 16 months. :yep
Since he lost to Froch and unofficially lost to Abraham both huge steps up, I have to go with GGG. His performance against Stevens was shameful, GGG's on the other hand...
LOL. Dirrell won against both Abraham and Froch. Every person with sighted eyes knows he was a victim of English robbery. His win against Abraham is in the official records. Win or lose, he still ends up having faced better opposition than a 4 year MW champion.
You got it half right. He's not ghetto, he's some rich Korean living off daddy's money and has drake and lil Wayne posters above his bed so he can whack it to them, guys a ****in loser.
Andre has skills but he has been wasting his talent since he left the SuperSix, his win over Abraham is better than any of GGGs wins but he could have done so much more.
That's right. It stands to reason that; If you cannot factually dispute it, then use the European offensive and attack it with conjecture.
True. It does appear on the surface that he has wasted time, But sometimes some down time can be productive. For example, after Foreman lost to Ali, he took a few years, came back even stronger, won the HW title and also made history. Only time will tell if this is possible for Dirrell, or at least next week's FNF. Still, his resume is far better than GGG's, so perhaps GGG although not side-lined has still been wasting time.