Golovkin vs Hearns

Bruce Curry, who fought mostly as a LWW and not above WW, is hardly relevant for this discussion is he? But, yeah, Hearns did beat him.

 

hahah don't try to cover your tracks as in 'he wasn't worthy of mention' when really you'd never heard of him before and you've just boxrec'd hearns record.
correct me if im wrong but saying 'their paths NEVER crossed' is completely different to then later saying 'their paths DID cross and hearns won but I didn't feel it was worth mentioning'. you thought he was on about don curry, probably best to just admit it.

 

So this is where you've going to when you're lost the argument? Good to know.

To answer you, I knew there was a Bruce Curry, but I didn't connect him to the MW division. That's why I, like at least one other poster here, assumed he meant Don Curry who also fought at MW.

 

good for you
and as for losing arguments, its all a bit girly as this is just open chat and opinions. But if youre going to offer strong opinion on a fighter its probably best to at least be aware of who hes fought

 

I'll leave you on your own in the sandbox, I think.

 

Bruce Curry hahahahaha you might as well say a chicken tika curry. LMFAO.

All you need to know is Tommy lost twice to Barkley who Benn starched in one round in between those two fights. I'd back GGG to beat Nigel, and I like Benn.