Actually, most do. That's already been proven and established. The f*ck you been? Trying to re-write history?
As it’s understood that you aren’t the sharpest knife in the drawer, I’ll explain it to you: 1. There is one way to score the series 2-0 GGG 2. There are two ways to score the series 1-1 3. There are two ways to score the fights 1-0-1 4. There is one way to score it 0-0-2 5. There is one way to score it 2-0 Canelo —>2-0 GGG represents one of 7 reasonable outcomes Because the fights were close, most will not walk away with series 2-0 for GGG. Subtract the opinions of GGG fan girls, and the minority scoring it 2-0 for GGG becomes even less.
95 percent thought GGG won the first fight, 80 percent thought He won the second. This includes Media scorecards.
I disagree that he was getting hit with big shots time and again. He got caught two or three times with solid right hands and once with a jab that looked far worse than it was because GGG saw it coming and pulled back, making it look like he got hammered. I have watched the fight 3 times and when you go back and look at what happened rather than what the announcers said happened you get a different picture. We hold GGG and others to such high standards that if they get into an actual fight we think they are done. No, fighters are just getting more competitive with them as they age, and clearly GGG is aging. Less speed, less effective head movement, etc. but the power remains.
No. You and your EE buddies did. Clean effective punching is how fights are scored and most boxing fans can't follow that as the main criterion anyway.
Nope, most people, including Mexicans and Americans themselves thought GGG won both fights. Stop rewriting history you piece of garbage.