Golovkin will go down several times in this fight and knocked out by Canelo Alvarez

If I even have a bias when scoring very close rounds its I give it to the fighter who is trying to make the fight.

You have nothing on me about bias scoring, the one thing you have are your Floyd pannies in a bunch because the last time I scored Canelo-Mayweather round by round I had them 6 rounds a piece.

A more rational fan, one who isnt too emotionally invested in a fighter wouldnt get so defensive when Mayweather is crticized.

Youre the dude that said "McConnor says the same thing tooooo..." when a boxing fan mentioned how bored they were of Mayweather's act. Hahaha

 

The Mexican has won every close fight he's been. (besides the early in his career 4 round draw and the Mayweather fight) As far as I can tell, there is only one fight that is argued as being "not remotely close" and that's Floyd vs Canelo. What other fights are you talking about?

 

I'm talking about Mexicans in general you moron. Not just Canelo. Inb4 another novel by shadow111.

 

No you give it to the Mexican.

 

Wow, lol

Youre so butthurt about how I scored the May'Canelo fight lmao

 

Oh you're generalizing are you? You said IsaL "literally" had the Mexican winning in EVERY close fight and even call robberies or draws for fights that were not remotely close. If something's literal, then it's specific to the poster. You're all over the place : citing "literal" statements of a poster, then saying it was really about "mexicans in general" without even knowing if IsaL is Mexican. Get a grip ellerbe.

 

Are you actually slow? First my original post was not directed at you. Trust me when I say Isal knows what I'm talking about when I refer to the Mexican. Why would I refer to Canelo by his nationality instead of his name anyways moron lmao. Instead of being nosy and butting into arguments that have nothing to do with you, just keep quiet and watch from the sidelines. I've been going at Isal for ages for being a Mexican dickrider.

 

Haha you really think it's because of Mayweather. Not at all. You're just the worst dickrider I've ever encountered. By far. I hated Super Hans because he was pro-brit to an annoying extent, but his scorecards were not even close to as atrocious as yours.

 

Did you see earlier when he was telling me that that Canelo left hook in round 2 didn't land clean lmao . . .

 

I may not be fully up to speed on your posting history with IsaL. Silly me for thinking that you saying The Mexican was referring to Canelo in the sentance "You literally have the Mexican winning in EVERY close fight and even call robberies or draws for fights that were not remotely close."

I have no idea why you would refer to Canelo by his nationality but considering you and IsaL were talking about Canelo . . .

If you weren't talking about Canelo, then who is this mysterious Mexican?

 

Yes silly you for butting into another persons conversation. Now stop quoting me weirdo.

 

Lol, it is about my Canelo-Mayweather scorecard.

You need to get the **** over it.

 

Nope. Don't lie. I've called you out for you Mexican bias for ages. I absolutely despise dickriders to your extent. You're on a different level. Nothing wrong with supporting Mexicans, but you literally give the nod to EVERY Mexican in every close fight, and even score the fight a draw or for the Mexican when it's literally not possible like in the first LSC/Frampton fight and Mayweather/Canelo.

 

Omg! Lol.. The first Frampton-LSC fight was hella close.

 

Golovkin will knock El Pollo out, doubt if Tony Weeks can save him in time to cheat, the judges will score every round for El Pollo even if Golovkin knocks El Pollo down in every round, but I think Golovkin will not leave it to the judges and not give El Pollo a chance to win by testicle blow......................Oscar knows El Pollo can't beat Golovkin, he hits too hard, too skilled, has a powerful jab, will set everything up....................Golovkin by knockout even with Oscar cheating like hell..............