Golovkins a fraud all that fake power got everyone gassed up

De garcia no tienes ni un pelo!

 

Hahahaha past prime ggg? Pathetic

 

Golovkin has threatened your existence.

Thats how great Golovkin is.

 

Ask Vanes if GGG can still punch hard LOL If Danny gets a fair crack of the whip he'll beat Clenelo

 

Gennady obviously is not like he was at 25 yrs old BUT He's STILL head & shoulders above any other 160 pound fighter put there.

 

****ing trolls, please find a new sport. Obviously one much slower

 

Golovkin can punch very hard, anyone knows that. All this crap coming from those who think Wilder is the greatest heavyweight of all time and that Horn is the best, even after Pac beat the hell out of him.......................Crawford is afraid of Porter and Spence, so they will need another kangaroo for their next fight, Widler can find a wino from an alley for Crawford, since they will not fight a legit fighter.................

 

If Golovkin is able to give MeatCheatnelo and 180 lbs Jacobs close fights you have to call them bum's too

How do you think a 35 years old Canelo would look vs prime GGG ?
in reality prime Canelo needed PED'S + a robbery vs old Golovkin to even get a draw

 

I'm assuming that the agenda you are pushing is based off the opinion that Canelo is the superior fighter. Right?

Given that, now, if GGG is such a fraud, how come he beat your boogeyman (77/81 professional scorers had it in Golovkins favour). And now, when the 2nd fight was scheduled, your boogeyman decided he needed PEDs to get an upperhand...even though, based off your beliefs, GGG is a fraud.

Which raises the questions, if GGG is a fraud, what is Canelo.

If Canelo is a bigger fraud than the fraud himself, then what are you?

 

PEDnelo?
CLENelo?
Saul "Buterol Kid" Alvarez?
Clenelo Pedvarez?

 

"77/81 professional scorers"? "decided he needed PEDs to get an upperhand"?

I don't think GGG is a fraud, but you're no better with off the wall comments like that. I've explained the reasons and the bias behind the majority who scored the bout in favor of Golovkin. If you judge Canelo by the quality punches he landed, and his performance overall, there's no way you can confidently claim Golovkin beat him. Golovkin just didn't. The reason why we hear so many posters say that is because they have such doubts about it, they come on here and try to find like minded fans of Golovkin to back up this claim. All Golovkin did was keep coming forward and throwing punches. He tried to outworkrate Canelo, which was all he could do because he couldn't match Canelo Punch for punch. He did not figure out Canelo, he did not by and large make the kind of adjustments you need to make to beat Canelo.

GGG is far from a fraud, but he's not as highly skilled as Canelo is. Canelo showed why he's a superior fighter, because of how he used his skills to set traps for Golovkin and made him look silly at times. But he wasn't given credit by 2 of the judges (and the majority of fans) because they prioritized work rate and punch volume.

Canelo's superior in the sense that he has a better all around skill set, he rolls with punches better than Golovkin, he uses upper body movement, he has tighter defense, he lands flashier punches, etc. Like Floyd Mayweather once said Triple G is just straight up and down, no special effects. Floyd was talking about skills there. Fighters who don't have those kinds of skills need to work harder, need to throw more punches and need to press the action. But just because Triple G isn't as highly skilled as Canelo doesn't mean he's a fraud, it just means he needs to work harder than Canelo does to win rounds because his punches and his skills aren't as impressive as Canelo's. GGG made up for his lack of quality punching by trying to apply relentless pressure to Canelo and it worked in some of the rounds and it won over two of the judges enough to get a draw and it won over a majority of the fans and press because they value punch volume and have bought in to the GGG hype.

The GGG hype is somewhat justified given how his career has gone thus far, but he got exposed when he had to fight Canelo because Canelo took him into deeper waters than he's ever been in. You can make all the excuses you want or claim that GGG beat Canelo, but you're not being honest with yourself. It's one of those fights that's gonna be debated forever due to the styles and how close many of the rounds were, and if you can't admit that it could go either way depending on what you value then you're just not being real about it.