The thing about the demographic is that you are much worse than the guys who blow smoke up Golovkin's ****. You are the same group who immediately jump on anyone who questions fighters like Floyd, Ward and Crawford. Yet you do the exact same kind of trolling it's laughable. You, just like Pimp C do not school anyone. You throw accusations around without anything to back it up. Although when not talking about Golovkin or Floyd Joy Pimp C is a good poster imo.
Also known as the "Panthers". Most of whom can be found (when not at the Blue Oyster Club) at Dontae's D!ck riding Nation.
Ward and floyd def have accomplished more...that's not a question ....that's why it's funny to watch people question them and let Lil g slide for everything U don't see these same people questioning kovalev ....but of course everyone like ward and Kovalev are just "lucky"....stfu...u don't know anything about anything Ur talking about more accomplished fighters than Lil g getting attacked .....and when someone questions a guy with a garbage resume Ur getting your semen stained panties knotted up.....fug outta here..., u ain't a boxinnga fan...ur a wasp fan
LMFAO @ you saying he won "no doubt" like the fight was actually competitive. Groves EASILY won. Froch still won, so I dont get your point . I didnt see Groves giving him much trouble in the second fight either. Had Frohc comfortably up. I love how you little g fan boys keep saying "brought to distance", like that's relevant . GGG was 1 round away from beign "brought the distance".
Without backing it up? I completely destroyed and schooled you with all facts and logic . I love how you say this "The thing about the demographic is that you are much worse than the guys who blow smoke up Golovkin's ****.", like you're not one of thsoe golov****s blowing smoke up his ass . Floyd and Ward have bought fought A level opposition, GGG has never fought above C level. Id ont give a **** if he's white, black, yellow, or green. I just tell it how it is, you saying that people criticizing GGG for his c level resume are worse than those who criticize ward/floyd is hilarious . Nice logic. As for Crawford he's still young. But with a win over Postol, his resume already surpasses GGG.
What facts? That Groves is shot? This isn't a fact at all its a personal assumption. If that's the case Murray is shot, fighting at a higher weight. You claimed Jack was a step up for Golovkin, the same Jack who lost in a round to a journeyman and has beaten a b level Dirrell and 2 shot fighters in Groves and Bute. How is Jack a step up? Zurdo beat Abraham, who beat Murray....im not disputing this. But again Abraham and Murray are both shot. Again this is your logic.
Ward has 2 A level fighters on his resume, Froch and Kessler. Throw into the mix Kessler was past prime and half blind. The rest of his resume is b level. Ward should be an ATG after the super 6 but through biting the hand that feeds him he's only just started to get going again. Let's not pretend that Ward has some elite resume.
So in a non competitive fight Groves still couldn't stop Murray but Golovkin did :think You can't deny anything I've said, I haven't lied or made things up, like I say it depends what way you want to look at it. You can look at it your way and I'll look at it mine. Groves is bang average in my opinion but gave Froch two very very tough fights, dropped him too and Wards best wins is Froch. Did Ward drop Froch or have him in any sort of trouble? Nope but Groves and Taylor have Badu Jack beat Groves ffs and like I have said Groves gave Froch nightmares and that's Wards best win :think
Ok Murray is not shot, he's just looked AWFUL since Froch. Dirrell, Groves, and Bute are better wins or on par with anything GGG has done , he's a HUUUUUGE step up. How is he not a step up? Yeah Lemieux's wins over N'dam who lost to Quillin already, 100 lost streak rosado, and Guerrero are better . Martin Murray already got schooled by the guy he easily beat. But you're right, Jack is not a step up, you little g fans have absolutely no shame.
:deal The young man is delusional, blinkered by his hatred of Golovkin, I can only assume his Mummy is getting pressed by an Eastern European and he can't cope :yep
It took Golovkin 11 rounds, he only went 1 less round than Groves , and Groves has lost EVERY world title fight he's been in. I dont know why you keep bringing up the fact that Murray went 12 rounds like that's relevant. Ward easily schooled Froch, Froch beat both Taylor and Groves . It's absolutely hilarious how you bring up guys Froch beat to discredit him . You know you've lost an argument when you do this.
I dont hate GGG at all, his best win just lost to 2 shot to **** SMW. When your best win is Murray and Lemieux at age 34, and his nutriders like you hype him up like he's one of the best mw of all time, do you expect no criticism?
I'm English, i have no skin in the game. I'm not a Golovkin fan, I rate him, I like his style and I like watching him fight but I've never been to see him live so I find it hard to call myself a fan. I actually go to a lot of live boxing, amateur and professional. In the MW division I would support BJS and Eubank Jr if Golovkin fought them, I'm not saying they would win but I'd want them to because I'm British. I have never said Golovkin is an all time great NEVER, not once, I have said he is a great fighter, a great talent but never said he is an all time great :good You just talk complete cobblers and it's just blatant trolling and hate. Anybody who sees me post knows I'm honest and consistent in my praise and criticism but I am also willing to listen to other peoples points of view and sometimes I've even changed my mind on fighters. Brook for example, I used to back him in these forums but after what seems like years of him not fighting anybody worth fighting I can't defend him any longer. You are just another troll like lil shockmaster, you make threads like these that are pointless, do not make much sense if you actually think about it and it's just another way and excuse to hate on Golovkin.