Golovkin's "illegal punch"

Discussion in 'British Boxing Forum' started by Unforgiven, Feb 21, 2015.


  1. Unforgiven

    Unforgiven VIP Member banned Full Member

    58,748
    21,556
    Nov 24, 2005
    Steve Collins mentioned Golovkin's tendency to throw a chopping-overhand-right-hook type punch to the top of the opponent's head ... and said "that's an illegal punch".

    Does anyone agree with him ?
    Do the rules of boxing bar such as punch ?

    I'm not sure. My understanding is that punches to the front, sides, and top of the head are technically legal, but punches to the BACK of the head are not allowed.
    But that's only from watching boxing for 30-odd years ... :lol: (I've never actually read the (modern) rules.)
     
  2. Jim Jeffries

    Jim Jeffries Ring General banned Full Member

    3,265
    571
    Feb 24, 2013
    I think Collins may have thought the punch was a further back than it really was.


    If was like the shot Golovkin put Rubio down with but more to the side of the head. It wasnt at the back of the head.

    I'll have to rewatch the fight again to see if it was at the back of the head but to my knowledge it was at the top side half of Murray's head.
     
  3. plank46

    plank46 Boxing Junkie Full Member

    9,475
    83
    Aug 23, 2013
    golovkin was dirty with the top of his head in clinches. thats the only thing i saw illegal.
     
  4. DoubleEdge

    DoubleEdge The king of Kings banned

    5,654
    3
    Jul 2, 2011
    That leprechaun was talking out of his backside all night. He was just frustrated because he was yapping on all night about if Murray had plan he would beat GGG.

    Its all good having a plan until you're on the end of a mutiltude of relentless thudding shots to all areas of the body.

    Only desperate butthurt murray fanboys will believe his lies about overhand hooks being illegal.
     
  5. Unforgiven

    Unforgiven VIP Member banned Full Member

    58,748
    21,556
    Nov 24, 2005
    Well, he more or less said "top of the head ... that's illegal".

    :good I definitely think he might have been talking sh!t on the matter of the "illegal punch".

    That's why I'm asking what you all think.
     
  6. Unforgiven

    Unforgiven VIP Member banned Full Member

    58,748
    21,556
    Nov 24, 2005
    I think there's a danger when throwing that type of punch - even if it's thrown LEGAL, aimed at top of head - the opponent might bow his head or move inside it, and then it becomes ILLEGAL because it's heading towards the back of the head or the neck.
    That's why most fighters who throw that sort of punch are called up for fouling, because their aim is off.

    That's also why Golovkin should be credited again for being so damn ACCURATE with his punches.

    But, again, I haven't read the latest rules, maybe Collins has ...
     
  7. billy nelson

    billy nelson the fighting scots gym Full Member

    15,859
    652
    Jan 9, 2009
    Steve is Correct the punch is illegal watch him turn his hand not his arm to hit Murray on the top of the head
     
  8. DoubleEdge

    DoubleEdge The king of Kings banned

    5,654
    3
    Jul 2, 2011
    It's a perfectly legal blow.

    There is nothing in the rules that says you can't hit the top of your opponents head.

    Vitali made a career out of it.

    Collins was just hating because he wanted someting to criticise ggg with and plucked that one out of his ginger backside.
     
  9. Jim Jeffries

    Jim Jeffries Ring General banned Full Member

    3,265
    571
    Feb 24, 2013
    Illegal punch or not Murray got beaten up. It sounds more like sour g****s or from people who really want to see GGG exposed than anything else.


    The punch wasn't at the top of the head. It was one punch like the Rubio shot but to the side of the head.


    Simply put it's sour g****s because Murray hardly threw any punches and wasnt trying to push Golovkin back in the fight. He was happy to sit on the ropes to try to survive the onslaught.
     
  10. Unforgiven

    Unforgiven VIP Member banned Full Member

    58,748
    21,556
    Nov 24, 2005
    I'll have to check this out again.
    So your saying it's not simply a punch to the top of the head ?
     
  11. DoubleEdge

    DoubleEdge The king of Kings banned

    5,654
    3
    Jul 2, 2011
    The rules in boxing is that the only areas you can't hit is below the belt line, neck, and back.

    Temple shots are perfectly legal, so you and that bitter leprechaun need to familiarise yourself with the rules before spouting falsehoods.
     
  12. Camaris

    Camaris Boxing Addict Full Member

    3,403
    963
    Jul 11, 2012
    schoolgirl bickering aside, I did notice that shot being thrown repeatedly by GG. I can't recall seeing anyone, ever, throw from that angle.
     
  13. Darni187

    Darni187 Obsessed with Boxing Full Member

    15,141
    546
    Nov 13, 2008
    Borderline legal , if starts landing right in the middle of the head than that's dangerous..

    That's becoming a skull punch.. ref should warn him there.
     
  14. DoubleEdge

    DoubleEdge The king of Kings banned

    5,654
    3
    Jul 2, 2011
    Every punch is dangerous, this is boxing.

    Tell me where in the rules it states that temple shots are illegal?

    Murray was brutalised fair and square within the rules.
     
  15. YearZero

    YearZero Boxing Addict Full Member

    4,494
    402
    Sep 10, 2012
    Don't know wtf the uproar is about, basically whats happening is he's throwing a looping overhand , but instead of it coming from the back hand, he is throwing it from the lead. Now against an orthodox opponent that will land over the top of the rear hand (which is usally carried lower than the lead), smashing into the forehead/top of the head area. Nothing illegal about that at all seeing as the back of the head is defined as the area behind the ears.

    Billy is I guess trying to say that he's punching with the inside part of the glove which is also bs as you can clearly see him turning over the punch and landing with the striking surface of the glove.

    So yes it's an unorthodox punch but it is also completely legal.