Golovkin's last 11 opponents since they fought GGG

Discussion in 'World Boxing Forum' started by slender4, Jun 12, 2015.


  1. The Shockmaster

    The Shockmaster SOG has 4 children...he pulls out of nothing banned Full Member

    23,047
    1,067
    Apr 19, 2014
    haha ok buddy...not my fault you are an irl re**** who cant comprehend and read between lines.....anyways......so whats your point? ggg wants money? why does he want cotto money? he can fight 3 bums on hbo and make the same money....he wants the name to help him sell himself further...and of course the money too while picking on a welterweight.....

    cotto wont give in because ggg hasnt earned anything.....he hasnt fought anyone worth much and he hasnt moved outside of his weight class to take a risk/challenge......and it has ggg fans in an uproar
     
  2. Forza

    Forza Obsessed with Boxing Full Member

    17,809
    3,693
    Mar 18, 2012
    you can pick apart anyones resume like that and make them look bad. Besides, when you fight GGG you're never the same afterwards. He ends careers.
     
  3. slender4

    slender4 Boxing Junkie banned Full Member

    8,959
    2,031
    Apr 26, 2006
    Holmes, Bruno, Ruddock, Tillis, Spinks, Berbick, Golota, C'mon.
     
  4. drozzy

    drozzy AERE Full Member

    12,271
    29
    Nov 2, 2010
    so.......im a ret4rd for not reading your mind through the internet.......yet you use no apostrophes, all kinds of.....word....word....some more......words........and periods........

    Nice style eh? :lol:

    There's no point in discussing anything Cotto-Golovkin related with you, you're too thick to acknowledge that the division's #1 contender vs the lineal champ is a legit fight. Lost cause.
     
  5. Mac mand

    Mac mand Guest


    It's not like he's not trying to fight the best tho is it ? It's shameful the way fighters refuse to fight him.
    Froch has been someone ive enjoyed for years,has beaten great opposition and is a hard *******ing,he's willing to step up and fight him,wot can he do ?
     
  6. Forza

    Forza Obsessed with Boxing Full Member

    17,809
    3,693
    Mar 18, 2012
    That's a terrible resume for a so called top heavy weight

    holmes was old as dirt, spinks was a natural LHW, the other fighters don't even deserve to be mentioned.
     
  7. Ducklerr

    Ducklerr Boxing Junkie Full Member

    13,815
    1,908
    Apr 1, 2015
    Ruddock (2x) is his best and look what Lennox did to him.
     
  8. slender4

    slender4 Boxing Junkie banned Full Member

    8,959
    2,031
    Apr 26, 2006
    No.

    GGG is a top-10, arguably top-5 fighter in the world, but all this, "he would knock out Hagler, Jones, Monzon in 3 rounds" stuff is tired. He's 33 years old, and has fought NO-ONE. Yes, he's 33 and 0, who on his record would have beaten, Hagler, Monzon, Hopkins, Toney, McClellan, etc., etc. They'd all be 33-0 with a bunch of KOs. Heck, so would Kelly Pavlik, who would beat him, Daniel Geale?

    And no, I don't hold it against him, you can only fight who's there, and who wants to fight. He's in a very weak era, it is what it is. I hold it against his dumb-azz, Johnnie-come-lately fans.
     
  9. slender4

    slender4 Boxing Junkie banned Full Member

    8,959
    2,031
    Apr 26, 2006
    Holmes wasn't really old for a heavyweight, he was the same age as Wlad and Vitaly, and younger than Tony Thompson. He was past his prime, but still a tough *******. He beat Ray Mercer easily after that, and arguably Holyfield and McCall. Spinks was a 6-3 LHW, and possibly the best of all time at that weight. Pinklon Thomas, Tony Tubbs, Tony Tucker, Carl Williams, and Berbick were all heavyweight champs. And ask Rid**** Bowe if Golata deserved to be mentioned.
     
  10. slender4

    slender4 Boxing Junkie banned Full Member

    8,959
    2,031
    Apr 26, 2006
    Tyson wasn't the same after Ruddock 2, and neither wasd Razor, maybe the roughest hvyt fight ever, Lyle - foreman had nothing on it...

    [url]https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=lcVJVvDTJeo[/url]
     
  11. Ducklerr

    Ducklerr Boxing Junkie Full Member

    13,815
    1,908
    Apr 1, 2015
    Come on, that wasn't the same Bowe from Holy I that fought Golota and it wasn't the same Golota from either Bowe fight that fought Tyson...

    And there is no argument that can be made for Holmes getting the decision over Holyfield...
     
  12. Ducklerr

    Ducklerr Boxing Junkie Full Member

    13,815
    1,908
    Apr 1, 2015
    An argument from convenience. Lennox was a monster and he destroyed Razor in a manner that Tyson could not.
     
  13. Manfred

    Manfred Obsessed with Boxing Full Member

    22,187
    5,402
    May 22, 2011

    UH, I don't think he said that but the fact is that he was stopped by Sulecki.
     
  14. slender4

    slender4 Boxing Junkie banned Full Member

    8,959
    2,031
    Apr 26, 2006
    Golata was 32 when he fought Tyson, and gave Ruiz and Byrd great fights afterward, I think both could have gone either way.

    Bowe was TWENTY-SEVEN and only had the one loss to Holy on his record when he fought Golata.

    You watch Holmes - Holyfield again and tell me your scoring.

    Watch that Ruddock - Tyson clip and tell me how much Ruddock had left after that.
     
  15. Ducklerr

    Ducklerr Boxing Junkie Full Member

    13,815
    1,908
    Apr 1, 2015
    You're seeing an awful lot of things in a way that is convenient to you...

    Bowe looked like sh*t in Holy II and III, let alone by the time Golota got to him. He beat Holy in the 3rd fight because of Holy's heart problem and for no other reason.

    I've watched Holy-Holmes many times. If you were the most generous you could possibly be to Larry then he won 4 rounds. If you're realistic then he won 3.

    Nothing about what happened in Tyson-Ruddock had anything to do with what happened when Lennox landed that straight right on Razor's chin. He got whooped by a FAR superior fighter to anyone he had ever faced :yep