Golovkin's last few fights.

Discussion in 'World Boxing Forum' started by VG_Addict, Oct 4, 2018.


  1. UniversalPart

    UniversalPart Boxing Junkie Full Member

    14,623
    11,801
    Jul 1, 2010
    He beat a prime roided Canelo the first time and arguably beat Canelo again the second time.

    He is still top level but is definately slipping.
     
  2. Pimp C

    Pimp C Too Much Motion Full Member

    123,040
    35,140
    Jun 23, 2005
    Ah I don't know maybe move up. That's what most fighters do when they fight in a dead or weak division.
     
  3. Pimp C

    Pimp C Too Much Motion Full Member

    123,040
    35,140
    Jun 23, 2005
    Stop it! You don't even believe that nonsense.
     
  4. BCS8

    BCS8 VIP Member

    60,605
    80,853
    Aug 21, 2012
    Ward didn't want that work. The weight advantage wasn't enough for him, he wanted GGG to move up all the way to 175 :ohno These are the facts. :periodico:
     
  5. MorvidusStyle

    MorvidusStyle Boxing Addict Full Member

    3,677
    6,004
    Jul 11, 2017
    The first thing is he beat Canelo twice, a highly talented boxer in his prime and on PEDs at least in the first. He beat Jacobs who had a significant size advantage and youth advantage too. Not too bad for a middle-aged fighter. In his prime he would have beaten them even better.

    Fighters duck him for years then he gets **** for picking 'bums'? Laughable.

    So then he's supposed to fight in a different weight class because guys his size avoid him?

    Let's get something straight, Golovkin is NOT a big middleweight. He's 5'10 on his tallest day, probably less. Many middles are visibly bigger. For all the propaganda Kell Brook actually outweighed him.

    This 'he must move up to 68' garbage is even more absurd in light of the Groves/Smith fight last week. Groves was huge compared to Murray (bigger than Golovkin). And Smith was huge compared to Groves. Imagine Golovkin weighing in with Smith. Why should he fight at such disadvantage even if he can get wins?
     
    BCS8 likes this.
  6. chatty

    chatty Boxing Addict Full Member

    7,413
    1,067
    Aug 18, 2009
    Who could GGG have fought at 168 anyway?

    Can't say Ward, he was locked out in a legal dispute and fought once in like two and a half years.

    Froch retired.

    Dirrell, Abraham, Taylor? Are they better than Lemeiux, Geale, Murray - I'd say same level.

    Degale and Groves tended to have short runs of form and I doubt he'd have got much credit, there peaks were like a year long.

    168 has been as barren as 160.
     
  7. HerolGee

    HerolGee Loyal Member banned Full Member

    41,974
    4,029
    Sep 22, 2010
    3g was not relevant until ward was moving up, you mean. 3g first title win, geale 2014, same time ward moved post break.

    lol at attempt to label flawed opinions as facts.
     
    Last edited: Oct 5, 2018
    Pimp C likes this.
  8. BCS8

    BCS8 VIP Member

    60,605
    80,853
    Aug 21, 2012
    This content is protected
     
  9. HerolGee

    HerolGee Loyal Member banned Full Member

    41,974
    4,029
    Sep 22, 2010
    This content is protected