Good Independent (Bunce) article on Froch victory

Thanks.

Wasn't Buncey on here not too long ago questioning Froch? If I remember rightly, he was saying that Froch was getting too much credit for taking part in the Super Six and that his resume was over-rated.

Welcome aboard, Buncey, the Froch bandwagon's big enough for everyone.

 

Bunce never ever said Carl got too much credit.

 

"poker addict Eddie Hearn"

 

All I remember him saying was that Froch should have had an easy fight before Bute.

 

I was sort of right, sort of wrong, I think.

Here:

http://www.eastsideboxing.com/forum/showthread.php?t=384732

Then, in response to this post

Buncey posted:

 

"poker addict"

I wonder if Eddie is as litigious as Frank?

 

You're wrong champ.

Bunce is saying there that he is sick of prasing Froch to the unaware.

IE - People should know how good he is.

 

Ah, I see it now!

Thanks, Grant 1 :thumbsup

Sorry, Buncey

 

No mention of the nonsense he was trying to conjure up before the fight about Froch fading. Typical Bunce.

 

I like Buncey but can't help but feel that he talks a hell of a lot without ever really saying anything.

 

The article is a bit over the top.atsch

 

Ramon's comment is negated by the fact that everybody forgets.

Froch vs Taylor was before the super6, not part of it.

Fed up of reading articles that wrongly state that it was part of the tournament.

Froch should get massive credit for taking that fight in the states!!!

 

Great article by Buncey, agree with everything.