GOOD NEWS! COTTO's belt is on the line

Discussion in 'World Boxing Forum' started by rjamesd1, Jul 24, 2009.


  1. saul_ir34

    saul_ir34 Obsessed with Boxing Full Member

    19,549
    0
    May 6, 2007
    so the fight is at 147 where Cotto won the belt right???
    of course not. Im so sick of this catchweight bull****.
     
  2. rjamesd1

    rjamesd1 Well-Known Member Full Member

    2,884
    0
    Nov 4, 2007
    Is it because PACMAN is the one fighting? :hat
     
  3. puga_ni_nana

    puga_ni_nana Dempsey Roll Full Member

    41,814
    5
    Apr 14, 2007
    anyone who is sick of catchweights, just don't watch juan diaz-malignaggi, floyd-jmm and cotto-pac and you would feel better.
     
  4. buckdacious

    buckdacious Sin~City punks!!! Full Member

    26,774
    8
    Jul 25, 2008
    good news!!! Look nobody made Cotto take the fight at 145, since he took the fight at 145 and the WW limit is 141-147 then his title shuld be on the line. Cotto just came in 146, is anybody gonna say the Cotto-Clottey fight shouldnt have been for the belt???
     
  5. 555east

    555east Well-Known Member Full Member

    2,948
    0
    Oct 24, 2007
    ^ how do you feel about this catchweight madness?

    **and if the Welterweight limit is "141-147" as you say

    how could Henry Armstrong fight for a Welterweight title and weight in at 138?
     
  6. rjamesd1

    rjamesd1 Well-Known Member Full Member

    2,884
    0
    Nov 4, 2007
    How about welterweights that could weigh 150-160 come fight night? :hat
     
  7. VanillaKilla

    VanillaKilla Boxing Addict Full Member

    5,611
    1
    Oct 31, 2008
    Or like when certain flyweights *cough pac cough* come in weighing 130 on fight night :rofl
     
  8. Realspitts

    Realspitts Boxing Addict Full Member

    5,284
    0
    Nov 16, 2008
    psychopath called it.
     
  9. Realspitts

    Realspitts Boxing Addict Full Member

    5,284
    0
    Nov 16, 2008
    btw, thanks for the belts HOMO!!!











































    -i mean cotto.
     
  10. Beenie

    Beenie Evolve already! Full Member

    19,105
    42
    Apr 12, 2008
    This was the correct move for all parties involved. :deal
     
  11. Brooklyn Boxer

    Brooklyn Boxer Active Member Full Member

    1,232
    0
    Sep 8, 2007
    I'm glad its for the belt but it shouldn't be because Pacman is not fighting Cotto at the true welterweight weight limit.
     
  12. Scar

    Scar VIP Member Full Member

    76,120
    2,760
    Jul 20, 2004
    Good news, to those complaining you guys forgot that Leonard/Hagler was at a catchweight too and the belts were on the line?
     
  13. JuanMa

    JuanMa business as usual Full Member

    3,448
    0
    Jun 26, 2009
    I had little doubt that it would not be on the line but i bet he got a couple thousand's extra out of it and probably his fee's paid for him, Cotto is a smart kid. He is going to need that extra money to make his uncle disappear. :lol: J/K.
     
  14. dits

    dits Active Member Full Member

    1,011
    0
    Oct 7, 2007
    Well, that inreases the stakes. Just hope we get a great fight out of this with both fighters bringing their A game.