your right he didnt deserve it. the top five p4p fighters today are: 1. floyd 2. ward 3. rigo how bradley got put in that discussion is the same way pac was nominated fighter of the decade with only 5 title defenses to floyds 13. rios was elevated marquez was elevated its all about pacs fan base and their trolling on internet sites. could be a professional company that does nothing but spam boxing boards for top rank promotions, the rest of the p4p doesnt even matter.
Resume is not the be all end all. P4P was created to see who would win if all fighters were all in the same weight class, Bradley should never have been ranked #3 based on that. If you want to say who had a better resume the last few years that's a different story. Bradley is the same guy he always was, wild swinging tough fighter. Very good fighter but not great imo and definitely never been top 3 P4P. And he got a gift against Pacquiao the first time, I don't see how he keeps getting credit for that win to say he's great.
Don't be bitter because he lost to a great fighter. Bradley is a warrior and credit to the sport. He'll fight anybody, his resume is one of the best among active fighters, and he has gave us some great wars. **** off, hater. If he beat Pac, you'd be the first lining up to suck his dick.
Pacquiao already beat him the first time. He gets credit for beating him 2 times. And Bradley is no saint you donkey, he's a cry baby excuse maker who if they robbed Pacquiao again last night he would say he won 10-2 this time.
Bradley is a better fighter than Ward any day. I would like to see Bradley fight another top fighter...............
I don't care if he's an excuse maker as long as he keeps stepping in the ring with everyone and giving a good effort. With wins over Prov, Marquez, Alexander, Peterson, Holt, aVasqueznd Witter, he's a top P4P fighter whom Pac did in fact beat twice.
I dont see how some people are trying to make Bradley out as a can or something now. He is clearly one of the best boxers in the sport. He lost in a good, entertaining fight to a Fighter of the Decade and ATG. It happens. Even all the top ATG lost a fight at some point in their career. If you never lose in your career, it usually means you didnt fight everyone you should have. Losing to PAC doesnt mean Bradley is not a phenomenal talent.
Bradley didn't get a gift against Provodnikov. Winning a close fight isn't getting a gift. I scored it 114-112 Bradley.
Depends how you scored the first 2 rounds. If you scored both 10-8 then Prov win, if you scored 1 10-8 as it should have been then its a draw, if both 10-9 Bradley won by 1 point. IMO it was a very easy fight to score, it was a close fight but no close rounds.
:deal Apart from Klitschko having an argument for better resume agreed on all points People also seem to forget how Bradley outboxed Miguel Vasquez, virtually shut him out