The Ethics of Boxing by Niko Tricarico: The world of This content is protected This content is protected estate This content is protected has an innumerable amount of laws designed, basically, to protect human beings from their own immoral tendencies. The rules and regulations of life are put in place to act as shields from the swindler, the con artist, the thief and the unethical practices of the perpetually corrupt. Left to our own devices human beings would eat each other without remorse; a theme most famously expounded upon in William Goldings, Lord of the Flies. And the proof of our unscrupulous nature is that we, as a people, continually endeavor to circumvent regulations and grease the pillars of our most sacred institutions with our slimy, green, polluted hands. Human beings need parents. Boxing is an odd sport indeed. At first glance it would appear as if all the civilized rules and regulations put in place to maintain order had been torn down and a barbaric fight to the death had ensued as a result. But it is law that enables the sport of boxing to thrive. Without the referee, without the ring, without the rules and regulations, boxing would not exist. It almost seems counterproductive to have a system in place to govern a fight, but when the fight evolves into a sport, it becomes necessary. It was the rules of the ring that Victor Ortiz so brazenly disregarded when he made the unfortunate decision to head-butt Mayweather against the ropes last night. Fouls in boxing are typically birthed out of the frustration one fighter feels in his inability to hurt his opponent and Ortiz followed suit. It was a terrible embarrassment and an inexcusable infraction, the flagrancy of which Im still struggling to accept (at least when This content is protected This content is protected Hopkins This content is protected head-butts his opponents he does so under the guise of throwing a punch). He might as well have wound up and kicked him in the groin. However, the events that followed were so outlandish they actually negated the severity of the Ortiz foul. The two fighters embraced, referee Joe Cortez looked away and upon release, as they were backing away from each other, Mayweather let loose with a vicious left hook/straight right combination that left Ortiz in a bewildered heap on the canvas. What Mayweather did, though technically within the rules, was worse than the head-butt because it came at the end of an apology. This is boxing. It is a sport and as such there should be followed inside the ring a code of conduct. At this point I find myself struggling to understand the psyche of a fighter who can find solace in a win that was obtained in such an unethical manner. Many supporters are echoing Mayweathers post fight sentiments of, Protect yourself at all times. I have read smatterings of enthusiasts remarking upon the fact that Ortiz should have had his hands up that the fight had continued and Mayweather was within his right to attack. And that is true. He was within his right under the rules of the sport of boxing, but Floyd would have benefited from a more honorable victory than the despicable nature in which he won. He won but so what? What did this victory prove? It was not won with skill, but instead callous chicanery. Is the sport of boxing predicated around the notion of finding loopholes in the system? This isnt the financial industry and as such, honor should take precedence. Are we to believe that the style in which Mayweather won was of worth and value? Is honor even important? What is important to me is that Mayweather once again revealed himself to be an unapologetic opportunist, a perfidious pugilist and an irrational egomaniac with absolutely no class. The shame of it all is that Mayweather looked fantastic through the first three rounds. He was not running, but instead walking Ortiz down. He was fast, accurate and impressive. It could have been a great fight, but instead it devolved into a controversial mess. Mayweather has worked hard his entire career to cast himself as the villain. I believe he has finally solidified his status and can wear his dark, corroded crown with pride. But we mustnt forget Ortiz. Because in the end, it is actually both men that should be ashamed of themselves. So now we look ahead to a dream fight with Pacquiao, provided that he gets by Marquez. The line in the sand has been drawn and colors have never been clearer. If that fight ever happens Ill be rooting for Pacquiao, but betting on Mayweather.
reminds of the riddick bowe and andrew golota bout. golota was winning comfortably until he unloaded a series of low blows and was dq'd by the ref.
copy and paste it on lour local pc. just in case it dissapears you have a copy. it's a very good read and applies to other sports as well.
So this is the new trend on ESB... Find an article that "exposes" a fighter who you obviously dislike, and then shortly afterwards, someone says amen and then says "Look out for the fanboys who will attack you." **** is old Flexb. We know you hate Mayeweather, and obviously anyone who would place mayweather's actions as worse than those of Ortiz does also. Any jackass can right an opinion article, and any jackass can quote it on an internet forum. The fight is over, and the right thing happened after one man tried to repeatedly hug and kiss another, especially after blatantly trying to hurt him with repeated vicious headbutts. **** Ortiz and **** anyone who tries to use this as a weapon to blame Mayweather. And Lance? You are usually a cool-headed poster, with the exception of your vicious *****-hunting (which can be amusing at times). I can't hate you, though, especially after all of our spats when I first joined about Williams-Margarito.
I didn't quite see it like that. After the ref said fight, Ortiz went in AGAIN to embrace with FLoyd, FLoyd didn't fully commit to the embrace (I imagine he was worried in case Ortiz pulled another headbutt style punch) and Ortiz had his hands by his side. The rest is history. Before you start with that ***** bull****. I can safely say I despise Floyd (as a person not a boxer).
Of course it didn't happen that way. That is a blatant lie, and goes to prove that anyone can write an opinion and publish it on the internet. And then someone else will use it as some sort of "proof" of their beliefs. For the writer to suggest that Floyd's actions outweigh the severity of Ortiz's actions means the writer is no different from some Floyd hater posting on these forums. And I'm not a Floyd fan either. I just find myself defending him sometimes because he gets unnecessary **** from people who are just being petty.
"Jack Dempsey did it to Jack Sharkey. During the 7th round, Dempsey hit Sharkey with a low blow. On his own accord, Sharkey dropped his hands and complained to the referee about Dempsey hitting him low. However, the ref had not stopped the fight, so Dempsey threw a left hook, which landed squarely on the point of Sharkey’s chin, knocking him cold before he hit the canvas. After the fight, when questioned about his actions, Dempsey said, “WHAT WAS I SUPPOSED TO DO?, SEND HIM AN ENGRAVED INVITATION TO FIGHT? THIS IS BOXING. YOU ARE SUPPOSED TO PROTECT YOURSELF AT ALL TIMES!” Dempsey was a beloved figure so instead of getting slammed by the media and fans, he got a title shot against Tunney." -- Ironchamp I guess Jack Dempsey had no class as well? You guys are ridiculous.