That is correct, in terms of the judges scoring. What you are saying is on the one hand "judges are correct" and on the other hand saying "an overwhelming majority can be wrong/misguided/liars". That's fine, but it's a double edged sword. It means that Max Schmeling wasn't robbed against Sharkey and nor was Jones at the Olmpics and nor was Flowers versus Walker and nor was Whitaker against Ramirez nor was Lara against Williams etc etc etc. These men all did better statistically according to you too. What does it matter? To shore up your position you have to have wriggle like a landed fish and hand out all sorts of accusations, not least to the "****-drinker" fans that boo'd a clearly defeated Pacquiao from the ring. You're not even entitled to your opinion - you're only entitled to side with the judges, working on your own logic.
so why do people think he won after rewatching, i saw **** drinker, when he landed they were clean, but thought the whole thing about this is points, manny was able to gather up enough points to squeeze by and can't compare this to the lara and williams, everyone know that ish was a robbery, but well that's how boxing rolls, folks can either ***** about it or accept it and move on, i tend to take it for what it is and keep moving forward, cuz i like boxing peep this bball, i tell folks this all the time, if you don't like somethin, they y keep watching, if u feel **** is all ****ed up, then go somewhere else and don't trip bout it if i felt **** was whack i'd bounce i think the ufc is whack, but u don't hear me watching it then moaning and bitching about it, i let that **** go same goes for boxing, if folks truely love it, then let it be, but if folks goin say they love it then dog it on how corrupt and stupid **** is, then y the **** u watching
i don't get paid to call fights if that's how the judges want to call it, i let it be, do i agree, sometimes i do, sometimes i don't, do i ***** about it, no im a fan of boxing, i'm not going to sit here and call it corrupt and stupid and keep watching, if i feel something is stupid, i stop watching
Nor do I, I just see doing it as an inarguable part of being a boxing fan. If that's your position, that's fine, but since the implementation of the boxing decision, this has not been the case. Fans have always, since day one, policed boxing decisions. This is a tradition more than 100 years in the making. If you don't want to score them, fine, if you think nobody else should, you don't understand either the sport's history or it's reality now. If you feel democracy is corrupt you going to stop voting, or try and change that? One makes you a useless member of society, one makes you worth having around. I'll let you work out which is which on your own.
After reading underlined, I knew the article was BS. Thing is I don't know what's worse, the fact that it is the wrong fighter or the spelling of the wrong fighter:-(
Vote for what? And what do Floyd fans have to do with "****-drinker"? Your argument is that boxing is great so fans shouldn't speak up and even if they do the judges are always right and even if the judges are right it's none of our business. That's spastic.
noticed that too given that there's that z, i don't think he ever meant to talk about anyone other than **** drinker, but doesn't excuse the no proof read
you brought up democracy and voting and i thought bout lighting things up by throwing out a lil joke, guess u aint in the laughing mood no my argument is if you like something, accept it, good or bad, but if you don't, rather than ***** and moan, just gtfo
Kind of like the reaction to black protesters in the 1950's in America? Exactly like the reaction to Vietnam protesters during the late 1960's in America? I guess if you'd been alive you'd have been all for taking Ali's title away from him. Anyway or no, that's your opinion, your entitled to it, thankfully most boxing fans have the exact opposite opinion, have since the first punches were thrown in a ring, and always will.
They thought he won because he controlled the action better, landed than more effective punches and cleaner punches round by round. This fight was just like the second fight, but with no knockdown And I bring up Lara and Paul because you are giving so much credit to judges and assume they know more than us, when they go and make a decision like that
well that's their opinions my opinion, **** drinker didn't do enough while manny did **** drinker, from his own mouth said in order to get a win he needs a knock out, yet he didnt' fight like he was goin for one (you feel you got stolen from the last 2 times, so y would you put it in their hands again?) yes the shots he landed were clearer, yet manny landed more, again its on points i give it to **** drinker, the rounds he won were more clear, and the rounds that manny won were close, but did **** drinker win more total rounds, no fight 2 i had a draw but because of that knockdown i gave 1 point to manny this fight i had **** drinker up, but after that dope 9th round, 10,11,12 seemed he really took his foot off the gas and looked tired (maybe cuz of his new mass) never once did i say yall dont' know **** and judges know everything am saying though that whatever they decide, whether right or wrong, i move on, i dont' sit and ***** about it
black panthers and "boxing protestors" are not the same thing we talkin real **** with that other stuff, boxing is a sport, entertainment but like u said, its all opinions, u got 1, i got 1, but it don't change the fact that what's on paper, who got the W and who got the L opinions are just feelings, feelings that can't do ****, facts are what's on paper
This is a thread that proves my earlier point http://www.eastsideboxing.com/forum/showthread.php?t=359905