For **** sake Stinky. What is the thread called? I'm not going to come in and start talking about France vs England, am I? atsch
You are much dumber, even if they could officially become professionals from 1991 ... how many years from scratch boxer need to climb the ranks become challenger for a world title ... 4-5 is the fastest you can get.
It doesn't matter, you call me much dumber but they could turn professional in '89/91. This guy; http://boxrec.com/list_bouts.php?human_id=3348&cat=boxer Had his first world title shot in a year of turning pro. 4 - 5 years is the fastest, right? :roflatsch
But you can use fair arguments, your arguments so far are ... common US is sooo large there is so population difference, you scream like a ***** ... why this does not count when you compare to Poles? Try compare just between 1994 when Michaleski won first world title and 2011 ... and don't forget to account the population difference ... this will be fair to me.
A more recent example, http://boxrec.com/list_bouts.php?human_id=427368&cat=boxer Title shot in 2 years.
Oh my ... one Thai fighting another Korean in his 5th fight for a world title .... it sounds you are Asian and you proud about that I bet half of English 'world' champions in early years was challenging 'world' titles after a few bar rumbles ... quite standard that days.
Nothing ... just admit that and don't play you are ****ing English :rofl and don't forger to prove errors in my math :deal
As you're the one defending Poland, you can do the work and list me Polish world champions since '94.
It's you who should learn to read. I didn't ask how many world champions Poland has had, I asked for a list of names. Chop, chop.
Where I have write about the number ... go back to post "902" click at the ****ing link you pathetic moron and read if you can. atsch
On page 65 you ask me to go back a couple of pages, in which I did. It was on page 61, but I didn't know that until you gave me the post number. Sort it out Stinky.