Great fight! Charlie Powell vs Norkus

Discussion in 'Classic Boxing Forum' started by choklab, May 6, 2018.


  1. SuzieQ49

    SuzieQ49 The Manager Full Member

    37,077
    3,733
    Sep 14, 2005
    1959-62 Folley scored huge wins over Eddie Machen, Henry Cooper, Bob Cleroux, and Mike Dejohn which propelled him back into number 1 status temporarily and he maintained a top 4 ranking during that entire period


    Patterson or Johannson should have squeezed him in for a title shot rather than freeze the title for 3 years fighting a trilogy
     
  2. edward morbius

    edward morbius Boxing Addict Full Member

    6,986
    1,262
    Sep 5, 2011
    "Folley was the tougher matchup for Patterson."

    Well, who would know that in 1958? Patterson's one defeat to this point was to Maxim who was a clever boxer but not a puncher. Why should anyone assume Harris couldn't do the same? He was a good enough boxer to outbox the fast and clever Pastrano.

    Who was the best man Folley had actually knocked out up to 1958? I think Howard King.

    Folley punched harder than Harris, but there was nothing in his record to point to his being able to KO Patterson.

    Machen and Valdes were more dangerous punchers. And Johansson was proving the most dangerous of all.
     
    choklab likes this.
  3. edward morbius

    edward morbius Boxing Addict Full Member

    6,986
    1,262
    Sep 5, 2011
    1959-1962

    Actually none of those men were beaten in 1959.

    These are men Folley defeated in the 1960's. Choklab made a valid point. Folks at the time didn't know what would happen in the future. Of the four men you mentioned, in the 1950's Folley drew with Machen, but lost to Cooper.

    Johansson KO'd both of them.

    It was Liston who eliminated Folley with a KO in 1960. Subsequent losses to Lavorante, Jones, and Terrell kept him far short of ever being the outstanding contender.
     
    choklab likes this.
  4. SuzieQ49

    SuzieQ49 The Manager Full Member

    37,077
    3,733
    Sep 14, 2005

    You’re a man of numbers

    Folley reached number 1 status in the 50s and hung around in the top 3 from 1957-1959

    So that’s a long time to be such highly rated

    Clearly both the nba and ring felt foley was one of the best out there


    His high rankings in the 50s alone justified a title shot!!

    You bring the 60s in the mix and he was definitely pushed aside for way to long!!!


    And Henry Cooper didn’t even get a title shot from Patterson. Even after his highly controversial decision over Folley.
     
  5. SuzieQ49

    SuzieQ49 The Manager Full Member

    37,077
    3,733
    Sep 14, 2005
    You keep saying foley got “eliminated” from a title shot.

    Brian London didn’t get eliminated from a title shot when he lost to Henry Cooper. London was rated lower by nba and ring than Folley when Patterson gave him a title shot



    Radamacher and mcneeley both never cracked the top 10 and were given title shots over foley.


    Harris at number 3 was rated lower than number 1 Folley, and Harris got his title shot without facing Machen in a eliminator


    D’Amato was careful like joe Louis said. He picked boxers who couldn’t hit hard enough to crack an egg. He didn’t prepare Floyd for punchers like Johansson and Liston


    Here’s Folley vs Cooper I

    This content is protected


    Tell me what you think
     
  6. choklab

    choklab cocoon of horror Full Member

    27,674
    7,654
    Dec 31, 2009
    I have a hunch Cooper was rated above Valdes as soon as he beat London because it meant he had beat two rated contenders back to back. Folley and London.

    The high ranking of Valdes was a peculiar interlude that must have been very brief. He was mentioned as #5 beating Dejohn in late 58’ then was crushed by Powell at the start of 1959. It amazes me they briefly put him above guys he had already lost to like Machen and Folley.

    Powell must have shot up the ratings when he beat Nino.
     
  7. SuzieQ49

    SuzieQ49 The Manager Full Member

    37,077
    3,733
    Sep 14, 2005
    I know you love Willie but he was more of a light heavyweight than a heavyweight. His entrance into the heavyweight ranks was far from spectacular, according to angel dundee “ Willie wasn’t strong enough and didn’t hit hard enough to do well at heavyweight so we moved him down”

    Pastrano had the speed but couldn’t hit hard enough to keep any large heavyweight off him. He lost to second eaters like Joe Erskine, actually got beat by Erskine at his own game.

    Pastrano was great against men below 180lb but anyone near 200lb who could fight it was a bad matchup for him
     
  8. edward morbius

    edward morbius Boxing Addict Full Member

    6,986
    1,262
    Sep 5, 2011
    Folley was rated right at the top in 1957 and 1958.

    Who again was the best man he beat after the split decision over Bethea? Rademacher? Art Swiden? Jimmy Woods? Joe Bygraves?

    He sat on his rating for almost two years before losing to Cooper (16-7-1 at the time)

    Personally, I agree with you that there was no reason at all for Machen to have to fight an elimination against Folley. Machen should simply have been matched with Patterson for June of 1958 at Yankee Stadium.
     
    SuzieQ49 likes this.
  9. SuzieQ49

    SuzieQ49 The Manager Full Member

    37,077
    3,733
    Sep 14, 2005
    Your hunch is wrong again!!

    Cooper fought London in January of 2959



    Here is RING Magazine February 1959

    Champion Floyd Patterson

    1. Ingemar Johansson
    2. Nino Valdes
    3. Zora Folley
    4. Henry Cooper
    5. Willie Pastrano
    6. Archie Moore
    7. Eddie Machen
    8. Brian London
    9. Sonny Liston
    10. Mike Dejohn



    Here are the NBA rankings February 1959

    Champion Floyd Patterson

    1. Ingemar Johansson
    2. Nino Valdes
    3. Henry Cooper
    4. Zora Folley
    5. Willie Pastrano
    6. Eddie Machen
    7. Brian London
     
  10. SuzieQ49

    SuzieQ49 The Manager Full Member

    37,077
    3,733
    Sep 14, 2005
    Bottom Line. Damato avoided fighting the big punchers and the best boxers in the division for as long as he could. He “slipped up” taking on Johansson because the press convinced damato johasnson was another overrated Euro.

    Liston cleaned up all the divisions most dangerous contenders Machen Folley Williams dejohn valdes..he did the dirty work for Floyd. He even brutalized Patterson’s best title defense victim Roy Harris in 1 easy round. Liston even scheduled a fight with Harold Johnson before Johnson pulled out 4 days prior. Philadelphia boxing historian Chuck Hasson told me word around that time was damato wanted no part of Harold Jonson.

    Johansson ran as far away from Liston as he could
     
  11. edward morbius

    edward morbius Boxing Addict Full Member

    6,986
    1,262
    Sep 5, 2011
    You do argue both sides of the fence, don't you.

    You maintain we should all defer to the high rating of Folley. The high rating for Pastrano doesn't matter.

    Pastrano was rated in the top five from 1955 to 1958, four straight years, and in all that time lost only to Harris and to London on a cut eye from a butt after earlier outpointing London. Heavyweights he had beaten--

    Layne, McMurtry, Norkus, Holman, Richardson, Besmanoff, London, Bygraves, Cavicchi.

    I notice he fattened up on Euros, like Nino did.

    I don't think it true he couldn't handle big men. Holman and Cavicchi were pretty big.

    What is true is that all these guys were second tier (except Layne who was a fading first tier) but still a solid level above the guys Folley was feasting on in 1957 and 1958.
     
  12. choklab

    choklab cocoon of horror Full Member

    27,674
    7,654
    Dec 31, 2009
    This list was obviously conceived before Cooper beat Folley. Why would beating Folley result in Cooper still being behind Folley? What on earh had Nino done to eclipse Folley who beat him? All nino did was outpointed Dejohn who is not rated on that list.

    Very unusual list in that it is a top 7. Seems a bit odd. This time Cooper is above Folley. Seems odd Machen falls six places after losing to Ingo and Folley just one spot after losing to Cooper?
     
  13. edward morbius

    edward morbius Boxing Addict Full Member

    6,986
    1,262
    Sep 5, 2011
    I have no dog in this particular hunt, but I must raise the issue of whether these are The Ring ratings from the February, 1959 issue, in which case the ratings reflect the results and situation of a few weeks earlier, or are these the ratings dated up to February taken from a later issue?
     
    choklab likes this.
  14. SuzieQ49

    SuzieQ49 The Manager Full Member

    37,077
    3,733
    Sep 14, 2005

    Layne was so washed up by December 1955 I don’t even know If he was third Teir. He got beat by 19-11 Heinz freidrich in his next fight then retired. Geez, this win means nothing

    Holman was another that was washed up when he fought pastrano, near retirement losing all the time

    Cavvichi? He was losing to guys by the name of giaccamo Bozzano by knockout and Jose Gonzalez by knockout. Far from world class, another one who was way past his prime

    Pastranos high rating was great, but Dundee moved him down because he didn’t have the tools or the style to succeee there long term. He had a rough stretch in 59 where he got beat up by Alonzo Johnson, joe Erskine, then a headbut loss to Brian London. After that Dundee moved him down for good

    While pastrano had a top 5 rating 1955-58, Folley had a top 3 rating 1957-1959, and top 5 rating 1960-1964
     
  15. edward morbius

    edward morbius Boxing Addict Full Member

    6,986
    1,262
    Sep 5, 2011
    In fairness to Johnson, I think the scheduled fight with Liston was in 1956, and Johnson pulled out because of an injury. It was not during Sonny's 1958 to 1962 title run.