Great fighters who were TERRIBLE at...

Discussion in 'Classic Boxing Forum' started by Russell, Feb 7, 2008.


Page 2 of 2
  1. PowerPuncher

    PowerPuncher Loyal Member Full Member

    42,723
    279
    Jul 22, 2004
    Delahoya looked terrible at 160 but at 154 he was possibly the best or top3 at least

    Hearns didnt suck but he lost all his advantages above 154

    Usually fighters who use their weight/size/height/power as their main weapon get owned at higher weights where as skillful types can fight way above their natural weights.
     
    PowerPuncher, Mar 23, 2008
    PowerPuncher, Mar 23, 2008
    #16
  2. JohnThomas1

    JohnThomas1 VIP Member

    55,226
    49,564
    Apr 27, 2005
    :lol:

    Totally agree tho, Gomez is conventionally judged pretty harsh at feather. He was definitely well faded by the time of the Nelson battle.
     
    JohnThomas1, Mar 23, 2008
    JohnThomas1, Mar 23, 2008
    #17
  3. Nemesis

    Nemesis Well-Known Member Full Member

    1,650
    15
    Dec 9, 2005
    Hide has never been beat by any form of cruiserweight
     
    Nemesis, Mar 23, 2008
    Nemesis, Mar 23, 2008
    #18
  4. JohnThomas1

    JohnThomas1 VIP Member

    55,226
    49,564
    Apr 27, 2005
    Far from sucked, he beat the thought to be a future legend Hill at 175 when over the hill, pardon the pun. He also gave Dennis Andries a shellacking there.
     
    JohnThomas1, Mar 23, 2008
    JohnThomas1, Mar 23, 2008
    #19
  5. jc

    jc Boxing Junkie Full Member

    13,968
    14
    Sep 9, 2004
    It seems odd that James Toney struggled at 175, when he has been champ at 168 and 190...

    Floyd Mayweather didnt look the best p4p at lightweight, he seemed weak against Castillo and didnt want to get involved with avergae guys like Sosa, he most impressive win was against Ndou who was quite clearly a blown up super feather.
     
    jc, Mar 23, 2008
    jc, Mar 23, 2008
    #20
Page 2 of 2