Greater fighter - Klitschko or Bowe?

Discussion in 'World Boxing Forum' started by Haye, Mar 29, 2008.


  1. WiDDoW_MaKeR

    WiDDoW_MaKeR ESB Hall of Fame Member Full Member

    37,427
    90
    Jul 19, 2004
    I agree completely. The more Manny uses his position to talk Peter up, the more demand for the rematch... and the bigger the payday.
     
  2. Musashi

    Musashi Member Full Member

    366
    1
    Oct 27, 2006
    I keep seeing references to Wlad having a "weak pysche" and that he "lacked heart."

    Gotta call B.S. on that one. Wlad has gotten up every single time he was knocked down in his career. Wlad was never counted out in a fight. Even when hurt, he kept trying.

    He was rocked and hurt by Peter and got back up and even dominated Peter down the stretch.

    He's had the best resume of any current top heavyweight.

    5 of his last 6 wins were over Ring magazine top ten contenders.

    He readjusted his style and continued his career after most of the boxing community wrote him off. 4 years ago, if someone said that Wlad would become the world's top heavyweight, they would have been called crazy.

    Fact is, he has persevered. He beat several good fighters, survived knockdowns, humiliating losses, and has escaped his brother's shadow.

    Wlad Klitschko has heart. For that matter so did Bowe. That doesn't mean that Wlad was somehow deficient in the guts category.

    Had to get that off my chest.
     
  3. KobeIsGod

    KobeIsGod Who Necks?!? Full Member

    7,318
    6
    Jan 7, 2007
    u wald nuthuggers never give up do. face it, wald has a weak left jab and an even weaker heart
     
  4. DanePugilist

    DanePugilist God vs God - Death Angel Full Member

    6,837
    2
    Oct 14, 2006
    Other than Holyfield and Hide there wasn't much else on Bowe's resume. On the other side - Klitschkos resume isn't worth much either with 2 wins over Byrd and his win vs halfgreen Peter being the best.

    Klitschko have some embarressing defeats on his sheets, but has shown he could come back from crushing defeats, something that Bowe never did.

    I am edging out Klitschko because I rate him as a better boxer overall - and his will to come back after crushing defeats - which is not an easy thing to do. Needless to had that he has accomblished more.
     
  5. Tunney5

    Tunney5 Active Member Full Member

    692
    1
    Nov 21, 2007
    I agree with this post.

    Wlad has unified two world titles now, and he has more wins, more successful title defenses and more KOs than Bowe. He's defeated several top opponents like prime Byrd and Peter.

    Bowe really has only one big win, and he was twice beaten up badly by Golota, who is really on the same level as several opponents Wlad has defeated such as McCline.
     
  6. Jazzo

    Jazzo Non-Facebook Fag Full Member

    9,543
    4
    Feb 5, 2006
    I believe that Bowe is vastly over rated.

    On a consistent basis.
     
  7. Musashi

    Musashi Member Full Member

    366
    1
    Oct 27, 2006
    So, rather than address the content of my post, you make personal insults. Brilliant.
     
  8. Rock0052

    Rock0052 Loyal Member Full Member

    34,240
    5,916
    Apr 30, 2006
    :good
     
  9. mattress

    mattress Boxing Addict Full Member

    6,030
    2
    Apr 8, 2007
    Probably Bowe but he was a coward for failing to face Lennox. I could not see Wlad doing that.
     
  10. Haye

    Haye Boxing Addict Full Member

    4,928
    2
    Oct 11, 2007
    No Wlad is a two time paper champion. Please dont mention Mercer on Wlad's resume. He was shot to pieces, and about 45 years old. As for Ibragimov and Peter? If they were back in Bowe's day, they would have been journeymen. Same with Brewster. And when Wlad did beat Brewster, he was pretty much washed up, undertrained and was half blind.
     
  11. Haye

    Haye Boxing Addict Full Member

    4,928
    2
    Oct 11, 2007
    Maybe not, but it does not mean he should get credit just because his division is poor. Losing to three journeymen does not help his case either.
     
  12. Why pick Bowe? He only looked good when he fought a less than 100% Lewis @ the Olympics then lost to Gollota twice :-( Bowe is one giant fraud.
     
  13. Irländsk

    Irländsk Boxing Addict banned

    4,969
    6
    Apr 19, 2007
    I see my exclusion of Holyfield in my top 20 has caused some furor.
    To be fair I will post my top 20 HW list. Also I want to add that I consider Evander the GOAT at CW but I don't feel his HW record is ATG level.
    His wins over Foreman and Holmes were both against the ancient versions.
    Moorer and Cooper were solid wins but nothing to get excited about.
    he was 1-1-1 with Ruiz, and I felt lost all 3 to Bowe, and both to Lennox.
    The Rahman victory was the result of illegal headbutting. The victory against a faded Tyson is all he has IMO, the second fight was a farce, Tyson was insane by that point. And that is it at HW. He lost to Toney, Byrd, and Donald when he was well past it and should have retired after the Lewis loss.
    Anyway my top 20,

    1. Joe Louis
    2. Mohammed Ali
    3. Rocky Marciano
    4. Jack Dempsey
    5. Lennox Lewis
    6. Larry Holmes
    7. George Foreman
    8. Jack Johnson
    9. Gene Tunney
    10. Joe Frazier
    11. Jim Jeffries
    12. Sam Langford
    13. Sonny Liston
    14. Mike Tyson
    15. Max Schmeling
    16. Ezzard Charles
    17. Ken Norton
    18. Floyd Patterson
    19. Joe Walcott
    20. Peter Jackson
     
  14. Tunney5

    Tunney5 Active Member Full Member

    692
    1
    Nov 21, 2007
    :good Good point. Wlad has never ducked anybody.
     
  15. kenmore

    kenmore Boxing Addict Full Member

    7,132
    30
    Jan 29, 2008
    Ibragimov, Peter and Brewster would have been top contenders back in Bowe's day. I'm sure of that.

    The difference in Bowe's time was that the division had three dominant fighters -- Bowe, Lewis and Holyfield -- who were in a class of their own and who could put on superfights. Today we just have Vlad and nobody else.