I would think that it would be Hamed (although Pac being the better fighter), but would like some other opinions.
Naz by a distance. He could lay you flat with one shot, Pac is more of an accumulation puncher rather than knocking people out with one shot.
Hamed EASILY. Pac lands brilliant salvos of shots in bunches to stop his opponents, Hamed would land with either hand, sometimes with no extension and the guy would drop. Watch how a tough fighter like Paul Ingle who stopped Junior Jones got starched with one short left hand. It looked like nothing, no whip, no leverage, and it only seemed to travel a short distance but...boom he's gone. Innocuous looking cuffing shots like against Kelley and the man is down and hurt. When Hamed landed with a clean combination like against Sanchez the guy being caught would be out for 10 and then need medical attention.
I don't consider Pac a particularly powerful puncher, despite what the consensus will want you to believe.
Naz, pretty high I would imagen. Top 5. He was a FW and he could lay people out like they had the life snatched from them by death. It was unreal.
Naz is right up there in any all time list for power. For such a small fighter to knock guys clean out with one punch, half the time with no real backlift or leverage on a shot was incredible
what is power if the guy that whooped hamed was pacs punching bag and mind you... look at pacs fight when he made sasakul (lineal champ), ledwaba (top 15 pound per pound) mab (pound per pound number 2) em (never kissed the canvass before) kissed the canvass many times and the great list keeps on coming :good and hameds power came into class b fighters :rofl :rofl :rofl :rofl
This post doesnt say anything I didnt say in one sentence in my first post- that Pac is the better fighter.