Greatest British Boxer Ever

Discussion in 'Classic Boxing Forum' started by essexboy, Dec 19, 2009.


  1. janitor

    janitor VIP Member Full Member

    71,579
    27,236
    Feb 15, 2006
    I would have to say Fitz myself.

    One name who probably should be in the poll based on historical impact is Jem Mace.
     
  2. Tin_Ribs

    Tin_Ribs Me Full Member

    4,404
    3,876
    Jun 28, 2009
    If we're counting him as English, Fitzsimmons. Very closely followed by either Driscoll or Wilde, my personal choice being Driscoll based on the superior opposition he faced and defeated. Kid's Lewis and Berg are a little bit overrated in some circles IMO.

    Post WWII would be between Buchanan and Lewis.
     
  3. essexboy

    essexboy The Cat Full Member

    4,063
    4
    Jul 12, 2009
    I agree about Ted Lewis but to be honest I think Berg is underrated, beat two ATG's in Canzoneri and Kid Chocolate, I rate him above Ted Lewis anyway.
     
  4. essexboy

    essexboy The Cat Full Member

    4,063
    4
    Jul 12, 2009
    Suprised only one vote for Wilde. Lennox is doing better than expected as well.
     
  5. red cobra

    red cobra Loyal Member Full Member

    38,042
    7,558
    Jul 28, 2004
    They'll knight Hatton before Buchanan, which totally devalues knighting, and this "Sir Paul McCartney and "Sir Elton John" **** dosen't help matters for knighting either.
     
  6. red cobra

    red cobra Loyal Member Full Member

    38,042
    7,558
    Jul 28, 2004
    Hell, you'll have a "Sir Frank Bruno" before Buchanan, the best that ever came from Scotland or Britain, for that matter, ever gets knighted.
     
  7. Tin_Ribs

    Tin_Ribs Me Full Member

    4,404
    3,876
    Jun 28, 2009
    I'd agree if it weren't for the fact that knighthoods are pointless, antiquated tinsel that mean jack **** anyway. A bit like the people who bestow them.

    I'd be prouder to not have one if I was old Kenny boy.
     
  8. China_hand_Joe

    China_hand_Joe Boxing Junkie Full Member

    8,217
    12
    Sep 21, 2006
    Why isn't Calzaghe listed yet Ken Buchanan is.

    I'm not saying the answer here is Calzaghe, but it is pretty inconsistant to have someone as unspectacular as Ken Buchanan and not have the rather brilliant Joe Calzaghe there.

    Legacy and talent wise, Joe is streets ahead.
     
  9. Duodenum

    Duodenum Boxing Junkie Full Member

    11,604
    290
    Apr 18, 2007
    Owen Moran is somebody who old timers might give a shout out to. Fitz invented the triple crown though.

    For the post war period, I remain partial to Buchanan.
     
  10. Tin_Ribs

    Tin_Ribs Me Full Member

    4,404
    3,876
    Jun 28, 2009
    Shoo.
     
  11. Tin_Ribs

    Tin_Ribs Me Full Member

    4,404
    3,876
    Jun 28, 2009
    I was wondering if someone would mention Moran.

    I wouldn't have him at the top, but he deserves a mention in the top 10.
     
  12. Duodenum

    Duodenum Boxing Junkie Full Member

    11,604
    290
    Apr 18, 2007
    Stanley Weston was very partial to Moran, and I first learned about him through a Weston magazine.
     
  13. China_hand_Joe

    China_hand_Joe Boxing Junkie Full Member

    8,217
    12
    Sep 21, 2006
    Calzaghe has better numbers and the better resume, bar one name who Ken lost to anyway.

    Nobody could imagine Calzaghe losing to that standard of fighter or only edge past against the standard Ken struggled with.

    There is not one argument for ranking Ken above Joe.
     
  14. sweet_scientist

    sweet_scientist Boxing Junkie Full Member

    13,744
    88
    Nov 8, 2004
    :lol:
     
  15. GregDempsey

    GregDempsey Guest

    anytime someone responds with a laughing face it means they hate the comment but they have no real way to refute it.....