what 3 voted nas?? he is bottom for me out of all those!rock bottom, and no chance of climbing..... although i did love seeing him fight, the cocky little ****!like to see more like him to be honest..... but this time a fighter who could handle the big names and had a ****in heart, not give up after 1st loss!!
Lewis Eubank Benn Hamed Hatton Calslappy In that order. I rate guys higher for actually taking risks in their prime, regardless of whether they won or lost. This is why Calslappy is bottom of my list, had he taken the fights he should have taken then he wouldn't even be considered. Oh and yes, Ken Buchanan should be on this list. If he were then he'd be right behind Lewis.
I meant pick out of the fighters I had chosen.Come to think of it why the hell did I put in the 'other' option.
Hatton would be above Hamed and probably Eubank - whilst on a level with Benn. Eubank, other than Benn had very little on his resume, defending the WBO for all it was worth, whilst Hamed had a very short prime. It could be said that Hatton spent too much of his prime in the WBU comfort zone, but still took it upon himself to seek greater challenges abroad. For that he must be given credit. In truth, he ain't far behind Calzaghe. Had he beaten Mayweather he would have been up with, if not above Lennox Lewis.