Greatest Ever To Lose a Lot

Discussion in 'Classic Boxing Forum' started by LD Boxer-Puncher, Aug 20, 2018.


  1. mcvey

    mcvey VIP Member Full Member

    97,740
    29,094
    Jun 2, 2006
    I have looked at Box Recs records for McCoy fights , this morning.
    There is no mention of any disqualification losses to
    Strong
    Matlock
    White
    Indeed there is no mention of McCoy having ever fought any of those three!
     
  2. mcvey

    mcvey VIP Member Full Member

    97,740
    29,094
    Jun 2, 2006
    Zivic and McCoy have no DSQ defeats
     
  3. mcvey

    mcvey VIP Member Full Member

    97,740
    29,094
    Jun 2, 2006
    Zivic never lost a fight by DSQ!
     
  4. GoldenHulk

    GoldenHulk Boxing Addict Full Member

    4,636
    5,186
    Jan 7, 2007
    Matthew Saad Muhammad, although he fought on way too long after losing the WBC lightheavyweight title.
     
  5. Jel

    Jel Obsessive list maker Full Member

    7,832
    13,126
    Oct 20, 2017
    No, never thought he did - just had a lot of losses which is the reason I thought of him for the thread.
     
    mcvey likes this.
  6. LD Boxer-Puncher

    LD Boxer-Puncher Well-Known Member Full Member

    1,781
    1,179
    May 10, 2017
    Very true, but he still had the losses. I'm literally asking just about a ratio between greatness and losses accumulated, whatever the reason for the losses may be
     
  7. salsanchezfan

    salsanchezfan Obsessed with Boxing Full Member

    15,800
    11,424
    Aug 22, 2004

    Might be a leading question on your part (well played if so) but of course there is no such ratio. Your question could only be answered in the affirmative if boxing history through present day existed in a vacuum, and nothing does.

    What makes a better fighter, going through the hard knocks and fighting progressively harder, tougher fighters, while taking a few lumps and learning and applying those lessons later, or...……...protecting that all-too-holy zero that everyone seems so fascinated with?

    Is Mr. Zero better simply because he looks better stat-wise? There are a few here who would argue "yes" which is sad.
     
  8. Tramell

    Tramell Hypocrites Love to Pray & Be Seen. Mathew 6:5 Full Member

    4,474
    3,857
    Sep 21, 2012
    Glencoffe Johnson. Champion who lost a lot during his prime, mostly attributed to home-cooking for his foe.
    2004 proved it. Got the IBF title after Woods, beat RJJ & Tarver, that is a great year of wins as he was 39-9-1.
    regardless of his many defeats up to that point,
     
  9. ETM

    ETM I thought I did enough to win. Full Member

    13,322
    11,713
    Mar 19, 2012
    While not the greatest champion though a good one who made a mark. Pipino Cuevas lost a # of fights before his run and then after he lost the title.
     
    Eddie Ezzard likes this.
  10. mcvey

    mcvey VIP Member Full Member

    97,740
    29,094
    Jun 2, 2006
    I've checked it twice today, copy what you see and post it..
     
  11. LD Boxer-Puncher

    LD Boxer-Puncher Well-Known Member Full Member

    1,781
    1,179
    May 10, 2017
    It's not really that deep. Of course such a ratio can exist, although obviously it will be largely opinion based. It effectively is based on how much of an ATG a person ranks the fighter as, if its a lot, and said fighter has lost a lot of fights, then the ratio they carry is going to be pretty hard to better. That is all I'm saying, it's not really a ratio but it's an easy way to describe it
     
  12. Eddie Ezzard

    Eddie Ezzard Boxing Addict Full Member

    3,493
    5,251
    Jan 19, 2016
    That's who i was thinking of. Mind you, while Robinson and Holyfield racked up their losses at the end of their careers. Pipino got his in at the start. Then again, he was only 14 when he was losing.