Greatest Heavyweight Belt Holders of the 21st Century after Lennox Lewis

:rofl :rofl :rofl

 

Swing and a miss. Audley doesn't make the top 30.

 

'paki merchant'? what is the meaning of this? and how do i qualify?

fraudley 'anal force' harrison is ****, you have to offer more than the fact you share the same type of passport as me, for me to back you.

 

Definetely Wlad Klitschko has been the most relevant figure in the HW division after Lennox Lewis.

Then you have Vitali Klitschko, Chris Byrd, Hasim Rahman.

 

WBF isn't even a real belt. WBF is one step below the IBO, which also isn't a real belt.

Also, you're failing to include that Chris Byrd also won the WBO heavyweight title. I'd also say that the quality of Valuev's defenses was worse than the quality of Brewster's defenses.

 

Audley doesn't make the anything. He's never been a belt holder.

 

Chagaev, Briggs, Lyakhovich, Jones, Sanders and Holyfield all won belts, which puts them all way ahead of Harrison.

 

I was trying to be nice. It's hard enough as it is to be an Audley fan/Audley.

 

First of all, the belt doesn't make the fighter, the fighter makes the belt. Audley has never beaten a top 20 opponent, and has three glaring losses against the three best fighters he faced.

Second, does anybody even consider the WBF a real belt? And if so, you might as well count every regional belt out there; and by that criterion, Audley again fails. Guys like Sam Peter have defended NABO belts more often and against better oppostion that Audley has.

 

:nut The European belt is worth 10 times more than garbage like WBF. Incidently Fraudley didn't win the EBU title, where as Lennox, Wlad or Vitali did. :yep

 

Vitali only defended the WBC belt once and the WBO is completley irrelevant to any discussion of anyone being a great champion, its as releveant as the WBFand WBU belts in reality.