Greatest Heavyweight Of All Time At Their Peak

Discussion in 'Classic Boxing Forum' started by White Tiger, Sep 24, 2010.


  1. McGrain

    McGrain Diamond Dog Staff Member

    113,405
    48,793
    Mar 21, 2007

    :lol:
     
  2. Bokaj

    Bokaj Obsessed with Boxing Full Member

    28,271
    13,298
    Jan 4, 2008
    Perhaps, perhaps not. If he had, I'd certainly given him more consideration as the greatest HW at his peak.
     
  3. McGrain

    McGrain Diamond Dog Staff Member

    113,405
    48,793
    Mar 21, 2007
    :lol: it's better than just a bias towards 1900 primary sources I suppose.
     
  4. McGrain

    McGrain Diamond Dog Staff Member

    113,405
    48,793
    Mar 21, 2007


    Well your conisderation is basically neither here nor there. Returning to the original point, Jeffries was probably the most admired of all champions in his own time.

    I don't think anyone would consider him the greatest HW at his peak...although Mendoza has just logged on.
     
  5. Bokaj

    Bokaj Obsessed with Boxing Full Member

    28,271
    13,298
    Jan 4, 2008
    Man, aren't you running out of monikers right about now?:smooch

    Yeah, my bias is that I like primary sources like film and records. Crazy me.
     
  6. McGrain

    McGrain Diamond Dog Staff Member

    113,405
    48,793
    Mar 21, 2007

    There's nothing crazy about that at all. Prefering film to newspaper reports puts you firmly in the camp of 100% of boxing fans. Prefering boxrec to primary reports puts you at odds with most serious historians.
     
  7. Bokaj

    Bokaj Obsessed with Boxing Full Member

    28,271
    13,298
    Jan 4, 2008
    Which actually was...

    ... this. And we agree.

    Ps. I do think it would be interesting with a thread about the most admired in their own time.
     
  8. McGrain

    McGrain Diamond Dog Staff Member

    113,405
    48,793
    Mar 21, 2007

    Pfffffffffft. The original point:

     
  9. Bokaj

    Bokaj Obsessed with Boxing Full Member

    28,271
    13,298
    Jan 4, 2008
    Now you're mixing apples and oranges. I've never said that I prefer boxrec to contemprorary accounts of specific fights. I've actually leaned on such accounts when saying that Jeffries had a tough time with Fitz and Corbett. If there are available films, I of course prefer them to do the main talking, but otherwise I'm happy to listen to actual fight reports.

    What I have been saying is that a fighter's record can be used to check claims like he would easily have beaten that one and that one etc, etc.
     
  10. Bokaj

    Bokaj Obsessed with Boxing Full Member

    28,271
    13,298
    Jan 4, 2008
    Talking about unreliable sources... This is the actual original exhange
    on the thread question "Greatest Heavyweight Of All Time At Their Peak":


     
  11. McGrain

    McGrain Diamond Dog Staff Member

    113,405
    48,793
    Mar 21, 2007

    There's nothing wrong with liking records better than primary sources...but either you do or you don't. You said you did. I said that put you in a minority. You say i'm mixing apples and oranges.

    Frankly, i'm finding the conversation increasingly bizarre and i'm just going to leave it be.
     
  12. bodhi

    bodhi Obsessed with Boxing Full Member

    19,229
    257
    Oct 22, 2009
    :lol:
     
  13. Bokaj

    Bokaj Obsessed with Boxing Full Member

    28,271
    13,298
    Jan 4, 2008
    This is getting bizarre. I said that I prefer them to how observers subjectively asses a fighter:
    I prefer them because they let me do the assesing myself. This is actually using primary sources instead of second hand ones.

    So if someone tells me fighter x is the best ever, I prefer to look at the fighter's record and fights before making up my own mind, instead of just taking the person's word for it. I hope most historians work the same way.
     
  14. PetethePrince

    PetethePrince Slick & Redheaded Full Member

    28,760
    84
    May 30, 2009
    Every discussion with McGrain ends up being bizarre. It's like a Ferris Wheel that's on a time loop. It looks like it never ends, but it's actually just going no where.
     
  15. ironchamp

    ironchamp Boxing Addict Full Member

    6,365
    1,034
    Sep 5, 2004
    I think that distinction goes to Mike Tyson. He was groomed since a young age to eat, sleep, **** boxing. And his background and obvious physical advantages in speed and power, he was deemed at one point unbeatable.

    Was Mike the greatest? No but during the height of his powers he was by far the most impressive.

    From the moment he became champion, he left an impression that led to higher expectations than any other Heavyweight Champion before or after.