Greatest heavyweight of the 19th century.

Discussion in 'Classic Boxing Forum' started by janitor, Jan 9, 2012.


  1. janitor

    janitor VIP Member Full Member

    71,579
    27,234
    Feb 15, 2006
    Who in your opinion is the greatest heavyweight of the 19th century?

    In eras where weight classes are not the norm, we effectivley treat the champion as a the heavyweight champion.

    Would be interested to see what people think.
     
  2. TBooze

    TBooze Obsessed with Boxing Full Member

    25,495
    2,150
    Oct 22, 2006
    Jem Mace as THE pioneer of Queensberry Rules Boxing, walks it.
     
  3. lufcrazy

    lufcrazy requiescat in pace Full Member

    81,365
    21,809
    Sep 15, 2009
    John L Sullivan from 82 to 89.

    no contest.
     
  4. Seamus

    Seamus Proud Kulak Full Member

    61,568
    46,169
    Feb 11, 2005
    William "The Prussian" Sherriff - Claimant to Leicestershire Belt Heavyweight Title.

    This content is protected
     
  5. janitor

    janitor VIP Member Full Member

    71,579
    27,234
    Feb 15, 2006
    Do you have a real oppinion, out of curiosity?
     
  6. Pachilles

    Pachilles Boxing Addict Full Member

    6,294
    28
    Nov 15, 2009
    Duran deserves a mention. Otherwise Sullivan
     
  7. janitor

    janitor VIP Member Full Member

    71,579
    27,234
    Feb 15, 2006
    Even you might have a serious oppinion.
     
  8. mattdonnellon

    mattdonnellon Boxing Junkie Full Member

    8,617
    1,884
    Dec 2, 2006
    Jackson, Fitz, Corbett, Sullivan..........
     
  9. kingfisher3

    kingfisher3 Boxing Addict Full Member

    6,448
    1,824
    Sep 9, 2011
    ability = corbett
    h2h = sullivan, too good physically
     
  10. Seamus

    Seamus Proud Kulak Full Member

    61,568
    46,169
    Feb 11, 2005
    You've read my opinion. Don't believe cyberbox or box rec. He won a hundred and six bouts on the cobbles, eightytwo by KO. A monster of a man with Liston like reach, Jeffries like strength and Louis like power. A griffon with a bison's shoulders, a panther's gams and the constitution of a breeding lion.
     
  11. cross_trainer

    cross_trainer Liston was good, but no "Tire Iron" Jones Full Member

    18,216
    14,031
    Jun 30, 2005
    What a pointless thread. Unlike boxing history from 1930 onward, 19th century boxing knowledge is worthless.

    Knowing about Leonard's title reign or the number of rounds that Robinson lasted against Maxim will surely make you rich, powerful, and attractive to women. Factoids from the 19th century, however, will not.
     
  12. Foreman Hook

    Foreman Hook ☆☆☆ G$ora ☆☆☆ Full Member

    8,234
    16
    Jul 30, 2010
    That Boston Tom McMustache guy sounds the best of the oldies, from what i have learned of him.
     
  13. DonBoxer

    DonBoxer The Lion! Full Member

    8,063
    34
    Apr 28, 2010
    Was Liston fighting in the 19th century under a different name. If so i pick him, if not Sullivan takes it.
     
  14. cross_trainer

    cross_trainer Liston was good, but no "Tire Iron" Jones Full Member

    18,216
    14,031
    Jun 30, 2005
    And to answer the thread's question, either Sayers or Cribb. The latter even repeatedly fought black men, and thus must have been greater than Sullivan, Jeffries, or Dempsey by default.
     
  15. Guyfawkes

    Guyfawkes Than who was phone?! Full Member

    1,446
    8
    Jul 18, 2011