Greatest HWs of the decades ?

Discussion in 'Classic Boxing Forum' started by cuchulain, Apr 21, 2011.


  1. Ramon Rojo

    Ramon Rojo Active Member Full Member

    624
    22
    Dec 5, 2005
    1890 - 1899 Peter Jackson

    1900 - 1909 Jack Johnson

    1910 - 1919 Jack Johnson

    1920 - 1929 Harry Wills

    1930 - 1939 Joe Louis

    1940 - 1949 Joe Louis

    1950 - 1959 Sonny Liston

    1960 - 1969 Muhammad Ali

    1970 - 1979 Muhammad Ali

    1980 - 1989 Mike Tyson or Larry Holmes

    1990 - 1999 Lennox Lewis

    2000 - 2009 Lennox Lewis
     
  2. Unforgiven

    Unforgiven VIP Member banned Full Member

    58,748
    21,578
    Nov 24, 2005
    Ezzard Charles probably belongs on your list.
    Liston perhaps too.
     
  3. Dempsey1238

    Dempsey1238 Boxing Junkie Full Member

    12,719
    3,559
    Jul 10, 2005
    I cant see putting Liston over Marciano in the 50's since most of Liston's work came in the VERY late 50's and early 60's.

    I think Marciano did more in the 50's than Liston did.
     
  4. Dempsey1238

    Dempsey1238 Boxing Junkie Full Member

    12,719
    3,559
    Jul 10, 2005
    But Charles had to contend with Louis in the 40's and Marciano in the 50's for such a honor of being the "Man" of the decade.
     
  5. Pachilles

    Pachilles Boxing Addict Full Member

    6,294
    28
    Nov 15, 2009
    Hypothetical Duran deserves a mention
     
  6. Dempsey1238

    Dempsey1238 Boxing Junkie Full Member

    12,719
    3,559
    Jul 10, 2005
    For the heavyweights?
     
  7. Kalasinn

    Kalasinn ♧ OG Kally ♤ Full Member

    18,318
    57
    Dec 26, 2009
    I think Holyfield achieved the most in the '90s, a lot of Lennox's best work was in the '00s so he takes that decade despite retiring in '03.

    Holy was the true Champ '90 to '92, '93 to '94 (but imo he beat Moorer), & '96 to '99. Plus he had huge wins in Tyson x2 & Bowe.

    Lewis was the true Champ '99 to '01 & '01 to '03. His greatest win by far was Vitali in '03.
     
  8. CF Gauss

    CF Gauss Member Full Member

    172
    0
    Oct 12, 2009
    Exactly.

    I don't know how Lennox Lewis can be considered the dominant fighter of the 90s when he was an afterthought for most of the decade (although, to be fair, much of it wasn't his fault).


    Think of the 10 biggest, most consequential fights of the decade. Then think of how few of them Lewis was involved in (just the Holyfield fights, IMO). It's tough to call a guy the dominant heavyweight of a decade when most of the prime time action did not involve him.



    I think Holyfield deserves this. He was the legitimate champ from 90-92 and 93-94. He was recognized by most as champ from 96-99. He was involved in most of the big fights of the decade.
     
  9. lufcrazy

    lufcrazy requiescat in pace Full Member

    81,517
    21,902
    Sep 15, 2009
    Fun spin off from the thread title :)

    1900's - jeffries
    1910's - johnson
    1920's - dempsey
    1930's - louis
    1940's - louis
    1950's - rocky
    1960's - clay
    1970's - ali
    1980's - holmes\tyson
    1990's - holyfield\lewis
    2000's - lewis\wlad.
    2010's - wlad.

    Where i've put the slash is where the decade is split roughly 50\50. With the 80's and 90's the two standouts didn't face each other until the end of the decade so I don't feel it fair to claim one had supremacy other the other.

    The 00's lewis was the man up until 03 and from 05 to 10 wlad's resume is amazing, he spent much of the time recognised as the best heavyweight even tho he didn't get the prize until towards the end, but beating peter then byrd convinced most people.

    As for the thread title - 70's had ali, frazier, foreman, holmes and norton. Closely followed by the 90's which had holyfield, lewis, bowe and tyson. Both cracking era's which saw most of the big matches being made.
     
  10. Boilermaker

    Boilermaker Boxing Junkie Full Member

    9,372
    473
    Oct 6, 2004
    You have left it out, but

    1890s is definitely Fitzsimmons, with his win over Corbett, something that Jackson and Sullivan couldnt do.

    1900s could be very close between Jeffries and Johnson but i agree with Jeffries.


    I think Riddick Bowe is a pretty big Wild card in the 90s, as Tyson still is.
     
  11. lufcrazy

    lufcrazy requiescat in pace Full Member

    81,517
    21,902
    Sep 15, 2009
    Yeah if i'm going back to the beginning i'd have

    1880's - sullivan
    1890's - fitzsimmons

    Yeah bowe was ok but I wouldn't put him up with lewis and holyfield, he did very good in his career, but not quite great. Ironic really because had the rematch gone his way we could have seen fights with lewis and tyson and everything would be different.

    You know what, since the fitzsimmons thread I did, I am frankly amazed at his feats. Like most boxers with a similar style he began wild and crazy but eventually refined his style and became an amazing boxer. To have so much success in a weight division he had no right fighting in is bloody phenomenal!
     
  12. cuchulain

    cuchulain Loyal Member Full Member

    36,405
    11,430
    Jan 6, 2007
    I don't believe he was being serious.