Greatest victory of the 4 Kings' fights with each other

For all the talk of Duran being grossly out of shape, it is well documented that Leonard made a run through the French Quarter in New Orleans on the day of the fight (same-day weigh-in) so he would make weight.

If Ray lost and you brought that up, the answer would be ‘he’s supposed to be a professional, that’s. Leonard’s problem.’

 

Both are great.

P4P Duran has the lightweight resume to consider but his exploits at higher weights are very inconsistent. He has a few nice wins and other performances mixed in there before he really started to fade and was a bit of a sideshow attraction on the casino circuit against Midwest journeymen and you really can’t consider those any more than you can Leonard’s last couple of fights or, for that matter, the latter stages of the careers of Ezzard Charles, Ray Robinson or Matthew Saad Muhammad, etc.

Ray has a much shorter career but he has more spectacular wins. Beating Hearns and Hagler are two ATG wins over ATG fighters. He beat way more contenders than Duran did pre-title, too, while still in the learning stages.

And of course Ray won 2 out of 3 against Roberto, clowned him and made him quit once and seems to get no credit for a super-easy win over the same Duran who had beaten Iran Barkley in his previous outing.

If you count Roberto’s mid-career (although we tend to think of him as way past it, he fought on so long it’s really mid-career) big wins over Cuevas, Moore, the brilliant loss to Hagler, Barkley, etc., we also have to consider dreadful performances against Laing and some other embarrassing losses.

Then there’s the oddball factors of quitting vs Ray and winning his lightweight title by low blow, which isn’t a good look and sullies how well he fought against Buchanan.

I think they’re on the same tier but I guess throwing everything into the hopper and sorting it all, I’d give Leonard the overall higher mark.

 

In that case, per the thread's question, maybe Duran's win was the greater one.

He beat a larger and slightly greater fighter. It would seem like a greater win in the grand scheme of things if you "punch up" and defeat a fighter who is more impressive than yourself.

 

Leonard over Hagler for me. I could probably be swayed to say Montreal or Leonard-Hearns 1, but I’ll pick Leonard-Hagler.

I’ll never understand the logic of someone saying “Oh, Leonard just waited until he was old, is all.” That ignores the fact that Leonard hadn’t fought in THREE YEARS before stepping in there. That completely trumps any suggestion of age and wear on Hagler. It’s a nonsensical argument that I dismiss as mere Leonard-hating based on half-truths or supposition.

Give Leonard his due; he earned it. It was a remarkable feat.

 

Leonard isn't supposed to be the one to win these fights. Macho guys like Duran; tough, gritty, bald trench fighters like Hagler; ominous Slenderman-physiqued guys with dead staredowns like Hearns. Those are the guys who are supposed to win.

It aren't fair. It aren't right.

 

It really aren’t.

 

Except for the fact that a lot of what I considered to come to that conclusion has nothing to do with where Leonard was in his career in Montreal. Hagler hadn’t happened yet. Hell, Hearns hadn’t happened yet. And he hadn’t bested Roberto in a rematch yet, making him quit.

Likewise, Roberto hadn’t dropped in his career assessment by quitting against Ray, looking awful vs Laing or gotten bombed out by Hearns nor toyed with by Benitez.

When you asked me which was greater, the answer I gave was taking in the meaningful parts of both their entire careers, not a snapshot in time. NOBODY including me, thought Ray was a greater fighter P4P with a greater resume than Duran at the time of their first meeting. Leonard was a shining star on the rise but Roberto was already a legend.

I also don’t consider Roberto a lightweight by the time he fought Ray. He was never going to make that weight again, even if he tried. He had outgrown the division. Fighters generally get bigger as they get older, so this wasn’t a case of too much beer, cake and ice cream.

Duran was a true welterweight by the time he fought Ray. He’d had eight fights over 135 in a row and hadn’t made lightweight in more than two years. Yes, he started his career at a lighter weight and was dominant at 135, but to dismiss him as a lightweight at that point is to thumb one’s nose at all of boxing history, which is replete with fighters moving up to higher divisions when they get older and settle into their bodies.

 

I guess it boils down to this hypothetical: How would the Montreal version of Duran fare against the New Orleans version of Sugar Ray?

And IMHO I STILL think it would be one hell of a war--because Duran was so fanatically focused mentally and physically.

 

I personally don’t cut him any slack — it was his fault and his alone for not training and maintaining himself properly.

However, not cutting him any slack doesn't mean you can just ignore that and treat it like a high-level win, as if he completely bullied and outsmarted a prime Durán — because he wasn’t in his prime.

@Saintpat provided solid argumentation showing that the Durán who fought Leonard wasn’t at his absolute worst. Still, he was clearly out of shape and certainly not prepared to go 15 rounds with what was probably the most motivated version of Leonard we’ve ever seen. That’s why, personally, I rank it as a good win — just not on the same level as the others against the Four Kings. The Montreal/Palomino version of Durán would hve given a tougher, more competitive fight possibly even beating Leonard again.