Green vs Flores - WEIGHTS

The moment he touches an issue he's come under huge criticism for, he's always going to come under question, and thats all there is to it.

Would have been far better for his shot credibility if he would have left the weight thing alone and focussed on some other area to do his mind games.

 

I guess you missed this thread then Stiffler
http://www.eastsideboxing.com/forum/showthread.php?p=7224583#post7224583
If you think mocking him in ref to my comment about him not answering his phone then im sure you will also dissaprove of the use of his mother in the PMS he has sent me.

He even claimed i posted his details somewhere and said that if you ring the house to please give his mum time to answer the phone as it would take her time to get to it etc, i then responded and said he is a carer for his mum and cant even answer the phone?

The other comment ive made is that i thought the stress was getting to him. Like i said Stiffler its not as if ive made fun of his mothers illness and the mocking is really his own fault in part because he plays on it and must think me for a fool as with the rest of you guys otherwise he wouldnt act all innoccent in public then go say what he has said in PMs to me with the use of his mum as ammo in a death threat. The screenshots are in the link ive posted, the topic was moved to the lounge and Zelky was banned for a few weeks shortly after.

Using your sick mum in a death threat is going to far imo.

 

A bit rich calling stiffy a hater who only sees fault, especially from you.
Stiffy is a straight shooter who calls it like he sees it. He doesnt give particular fighter passes because they are on his favorite fighters list.

If you're gunna enjoy the fight, then fine. But dont hate on others who are sceptical, and see holes in the mechanics of the fight.

 

That's professional boxing my friend. Always looking for an edge. It goes on ALL THE TIME. Paul Williams is doing it this weekend!!!!!!

 

Very true, but then why defend it and call it something else.

 

he seems to forget i was a Green fan lost money to you,the TAB and wore ***goty avatars for 4 months from lost avatar bets when Mundine beat him.supported him when he moved up to LHW and won the WBA strap.seen what a clown he was when he retired and made that stupid 'Danny Green story'doco on FOX.probably a decent guy IRL doesnt get involved in **** like NRL players.

 

I appreciate the Brother Lee Love pecks, but all I did was get sick of seeing the same old breathless rambling hate from stiffy and spoke up about it. I don't hate anyone.

He then went at me about Stoney and all sorts of other **** as if he's in a position to judge me.

He's not above reproach himself, but he's bloody quick to criticise others as if he's without sin.

Glass houses and all that.

 

Yeah, and your answer is to have a go at me for stuff that you were part of and got a laugh out of too, or go looking for old posts of mine where I contradict myself.

You're allowed to join in the fun and even change your mind about Green, but I'm not.

Werd up Vatican City, Australia's got another Saint on his way!!!

 

True mate. I just think that considering the circumstances and the weight stuff, getting an edge via another angle would have boosted his cred more.

 

I'm not defending anything, so much as I'm saying "big deal". It's smart in the fact that it creates a more level playing field for Danny. I doubt very much it'll make the slightest bit of difference come fight time. It may however put some doubts into Flores' mind. It's the biggest storm in a teacup I've seen on here in a lonnnnnng time.

 

you seem to think i trawled through your posts looking to trip you up like you did with your 3 part rant against TC Boxa.the thread was started by me,i vaguely recalled you having a different outlook clicked on my name searched through threads started by me found that one.quite easy and no real effort.

 

One of the threads you quoted was dated 2008.

 

Fair enough, but it's not like he's the first one to repeatedly post tiresome posts about a particular fighter. It's no different to what you and more so sallywinder do about Mundine, or even myself about the Roosters.

One thing I've noticed about this forum is that pretty much everything gets regurgitated, whether ot be by now posters, new old posters popping up, etc.

Regarding Gav, stiff like most of us here is all for giving a guy a sledging at having fun at his expense. He just saw it as going to far, or not his cup of tea having a go about him helping out the disabled, and thats fair enough. Like yourself when people were really pushing the frog jenkins pedo thing.

 

I didn't mean you specifically defending, but it seems Greens fans don't really want to make anything of it at all, as if it is just every day stuff.

It isn't really a big deal either, but in this case, what with Greens prior antics with weight, I actually think it is a reasonable deal, simply because everyone was watching and waiting for some kind of odd thing to happen, and sure enough.....

Oh, no question about that, however that doesn't make it less questionable for everyone else.

Probably not, but there's always the possibility it could.
We would probably never really know though as whatever ever excuses BJ comes up with if he loses, he'll be slammed for them as no one will know if they're legit.
BJ is screwed either way.

And rightly so IMO.

In a nutshell, the 'incentive' should not have existed, and as you have rightly pointed out, it would likely have made little difference anyway.

 

What's this stuff about giving Stoney stick for helping the disabled? I never did that.

I crashed his website and gave him **** for trying to post articles on the training forum about how the heavy bag was a great workout because he had just started doing a personal trainer's course and thought he knew everything, but I don't recall him having anything to do with disabled people.