Not an easy pick for me.. On one hand, Khan has lightening speed and good power, while Haugen has tremendous accuracy and durability. I think anyone can take this, and wouldn't be surprised to see a split outcome in a trilogy.
If Khan uses his speed he would win easily enough, but the way he fights without a gameplan is Greg's fight.
It would be amusing to see someone so athletically inferior to Khan compete with him on at least even terms.
Haugen was a good little fighter. He'd beat Khan, imo. So would someone like Ray Mancini. I'd even pick someone as small as Barry Michael to give Khan problems.
Haugen has the style to give Khan fits, but none of the attributes. Khan UD. He'd be just a bit too fast.
Think it would resemble the sloppy,though fairly entertaining fight that was the first Pazienza-Haugen out.Khan's superior speed,athleticism and greater punch output giving him the edge in a closely contested fight. Mancini is actually a good shout.