Groves: Froch is scared of damage in rematch

well, you have posted it on a message board under a pseudonym, so it can only be true.

 

Judging by Groves face, I think he took a few as well !!!

 

your meant to be on his ignore list

 

says the man whose lies about the rematch were thoroughly dismantled. or are you still in denial about that?

incidentally, i never claimed to be a sports journalist, let alone the best. you even fail at posting truths on a message board. what are we supposed to be asking, by the way?

 

If Froch got robbed the way Groves did you would be the 1st to moan, i.e Beltran burns. This was on the same level. You just gotta accept things in life sometimes. Froch got mullered by Groves.

Back on topic, every word is the truth. GG speaks the truth

 

i fully understand that gg didn't want hearn to have future options on his career, no issue for me. i ain't the 1 who felt the need to invent a rematch for free clause to try to justify it.

you still sound like a halfwit who throws out a non-sequitur every time you know you're beaten logically. look it up.

 

i could not give a fuc k
froch you could argue was job out of the first kessler fight you hear anything :bart groves did out box froch and threw the kitchen sink at him and could not finish , so how long you been a groves fan now
you heard about the way groves spoke and treat booths recpcitonist :verysadquality guy
just hope some one never upsets your girl like that or you would have to man up

 

why should i when i'm enjoying giving you enough rope?

where's your evidence regards measly pay?

what makes you think i reckon gg doesn't want the fight?

who is the 1 who has been repeatedly shown up for posting lies and resorts to insults?

how have you illustrated my struggles with reason?

my 1st post aimed at you gave credit to both men and questioned your lack of self awareness. at the time i had no idea how much i was underestimating it. keep it up, genius.

 

Ryan this is what you said on page 3 of this thread:

"The offer Hearn made Froch was apparently 'seven figures', but it was a multi fight deal. Including a rematch clause with Froch, so basically if George beats Froch he has to fight him again with no further money because that is part of the deal.

So for those who don't understand George would potentially have to fight Froch (if Froch wants) 2 times for 'seven figures'. That's two fights worth £20 million, but Groves would only pick up £1 million for both.
So you cant blame Groves for holding out for purse bids to maximise his 15% because that's what is better for him since Froch and Hearn are trying lowball him and make a fortune out of him."

Yet despite being asked a few times, nowhere have you proved this is in the contract and this is what posters are talking about when we say you're talking ****, ive asked you to provide proof in other threads of your wild claims on various things yet you just duck and throw insults. Just give it up because no one is taking you seriously right now. Yes there were options,everyone knows that but very few people know what they ACTUALLY were and i doubt you're one of them. Proof isnt simply "Groves rejected the deal" either as that doesnt explain what he explicitly objected to-i.e. line by line clauses/options

Now unless you can back it up i suggest you leave it as its all very tiresome. Now, i need to get back to the Eddie Johnson\Chambers debacle i created...if only i could get past Appeal 460 from Mr Groves....

 

I think this is the point most people were making, pure conjecture...
However if you point it out your a troll or your on w*nkers lists ........:hey:hey MELTDOWN

 

meltdown simba style