Anderson is a bully and a thug. I'm glad that Groves is ****ing him over and playing mind games. He's getting everything that he deserves and if they fight again, he'll get brutally knocked out again, which is what he also deserves. He's a piece of **** and he's the one who is solely responsible for the animosity.
How is Anderson a piece of ****? What the hell is this based on? Hardly gone round killing puppies has he...
Look at the people he's known to associate with or the crimes he nearly got sent down for. He attacked someone with a hammer, for ****s sake. If anyone thinks the threat to Groves didn't come from Anderson's associates, they're deluding themselves. Groves was told of a death threat by the police because certain people wanted to **** him up and make him throw the fight. Like I said, he's a piece of **** and he deserves every bit of **** luck that's come to him and a lot more. What goes around, comes around.
Probably because Anderson has insulted him and complained that he was somehow robbed of a win. I don't get why the support for Anderson over this. Also, who gives a **** about the belt? Some of you on here are such crybabies. "Oh, so disrespectful!"
Jack, are you referring to this? http://www.thesun.co.uk/sol/homepag...boxer-George-Groves-during-live-TV-fight.html
Yeah, that's it. I'm sure I read somewhere that one of the other people accused of attacking the drug dealer was sent to prison for a long stretch. **** knows why he has so many supporters in this feud.
Anderson barely mentions Groves anymore apart from when asked, yet Groves seems to constantly mention Anderson. British title is prestigious and Groves is holding it when he doesn't have the right to, most British fighters only dream of having that belt he is just disrepecting it. But Groves is a ***** so has to be expected
Nothing, I'm just saying I don't criticise Groves for being a ***** towards towards Anderson because he deserves it. The BBBoC are the ones who have messed up by not making sure they had possession of the belt. They should have had it in their possession months ago. What I don't understand is how anyone can be sympathetic towards Anderson. If there was such a thing as karma, far worse things would happen to Anderson than not getting a title belt. Who cares? It's a trinket. He's can still call himself the "British Champion" which is all that matters, not a small belt which he'll have for a few weeks.
Jack it's ok saying ****ing Anderson over but what about Reid?. If Robin won last night he'd of been parading a belt that isn't the rightful one. It's poorest of form from Groves towards both men inparticular Reid who isn't anything to do with this petty feud. I agree the board should of sorted it out, but Groves was informed of the goings on and has been petty to say the least.
Yeah, that's a fair point. It's not good from Groves but I can understand his resentment towards Anderson though it's a shame that Reid was included in the ongoing feud. Maybe Groves was thinking that an Anderson win was inevitable? I don't know but either way, it's not right. Groves should have given the belt back and if he didn't, the board should have demanded he give it back.