Guzman needs outside help to beat Alex Arthur?

Guzman aint going to need any outside help to beat Arthurs Guzman will butt **** the kid, sorry bout that Dunky cause I know you like him, but he is going to gt his arse kicked I.M.O.

 

For what its worth Micheal Brodie an excellent picker - who has sparred with Guzman reckons Guzman will be handily winning.

 

How to lose all credability as a poster in 1 short sentence!

Dunky, I think that clown has summed up his knowledge there, and as such I suggest you refrain from attempting reasoned debate with this moron!

As i stated previously, I fancy Alex to use his size, strength and determination to frustrate and grind down Guzman in 7! I would not however state that anything other than my opinion is 'impossible' unlike the said muppet 'huki.'

As a side note, I reckon that hiki will be a fan of one of the 'big 4' ; has not seen Guzman fight (ie his basis of how good Guzman is is derived from other posters and youtube clips) ; and thought Hatton would beat Mayweather (and still contests that the only reason he lost was Cortez).

I know I am getting a bit personal, but Huki is the epitome of all that is wrong with this forum!

 

Yeah Gomez really likes him- he had nothing but good things to say about him when I asked.

 

Do I even need to reply to this?

It's not impossible, but it's less than a 1% chance. If you care to know, I've seen a total of 10 full Guzman fights that I have on DVD at least three times each and if you want to go back and check, you'll see that I picked Mayweather TKO10 Hatton back in December.

What the **** are you talking about? If you want to talk about losing credibility, then don't say that Arthur will stop Guzman in the same post. You have zero "credibility" after stating that prediction and you know nothing about boxing. Guzman TKO3 Arthur. I can't wait to come back here after the fight..

 

hey, huki...I agree with you that Guzman is the big favourite, but I always think you are exaggerating your percentages...

1%???

I bet the chance of a lucky KO punch landing at least once in 100 fights is greater than 1, at this level, where both fighters are world class.

Surely, the minimum chance any fighter of this calibre has is at least 5%...taking cuts and everything else into consideration.

Surely!:huh

 

Peak Brodie beats Peak Harrison all day - good night Dunky :hi:

 

If anything, I'm being too nice to Arthur. It's ridiculous that there are a number of people on this forum who think Arthur has a good chance of winning. One guy is a weak chinned lower B level fighter (at best) and the other is an A+ level top 5 P4P H2H fighter with an iron chin. 5%? So you're saying if they fought 20 times Arthur would win once? I highly doubt that. Take a look at 100 situations like Arthur-Guzman and you'll see. When was the last time an upset like Arthur beating Guzman happened? How many situations like Guzman-Arthur have there been since that happened? It's less than a 1% chance.

Arthur KO'ing Guzman with a lucky punch would be one the biggest upsets in the history of boxing. Have you seen Arthur fight before? He's barely "world class", he's a top domestic fighter who's very fortunate to have a bull**** interim world title. He was stopped by Gomez early and went life and death with Stephen Foster in his last fight. Guzman is going to blow him out. Guzman's previous opponents like Jauregui and Jaendang would probably beat Arthur too, I don't even need to mention Soto and Barrios. 1% is the realistic chance, I don't think 5% is.

I could swear on anything that I will honor the bet and wear any avatar you choose for the rest of my time here on this forum. Hopefully you will honor your bet too if you lose. Man.. you're in for a big surprise.

 

It is a 100% chance.

All picks should be based on determinism.