Guzman needs outside help to beat Alex Arthur?

As Jeff says...thats a bit of a gay picture you posted there Huki. Your first point:

' I'm being 100% objective, Guzman is superior to Arthur in every single way. You can't argue with that fact.'

Err...well, of course it can be argued with. It isn't a fact, it is your opinion, which you seem to confuse easily. A fact is something like Arthur being the bigger man...that is a fact because we know both their heights. You saying Guzman is better in everyway is not a fact...that is just your belief.

As for your other points. Good chin for a domestic fighter for example. Actually, a lot of Arthurs fights have not been domestic fights to be fair, with commonwealth and european. He has also fought a few South Americans in his time as well.

Same applies to having a decent dig at SF...not just domestic you will find. I'm pretty sure there are quotes of Willie Limmond also saying he hits harder than Amir Khan somewhere. Considering thats the weight above, and the sun shines out of Khans arse, thats not bad praise.

You mention the Foster fight too...which is fair enough, because it wasn't a dazzling display by Arthur, but one he clearly won in the end (despite the flash knockdown). But you do seem to come across as someone who watched (perhaps not even that) the Foster fight, knew that Arthur had lost to Gomez many moons ago, and decided he is useless?

I'm trying to be logical and fair here Huki, and answering your comments in a balanced way. I'm not sure why, because you seem just to be trotting out very general things (Guzman is so good, he's this, he's that etc) without any sort of examples. I mean, surely even you would agree that it seems like Guzman has not carried a lot of power up to the SF division?

 

:rofl

 

The rocket's called joan for **** sake. How the **** can someone with a girlie name beat alex arthur? He must have a glock in his gangsta handbag. :yep

 

How is that picture gay? You're the homos obsessing and crying over his looks, all I did was post a picture of the man.

AAA, you know you're trying way too hard when you have to pull quotes from Willie Limmond to make your fighter seem better than he really is.

There's no point of trying to argue logically about why Guzman will beat Arthur. It's too obvious. If you don't think it's obvious you clearly don't know anything about boxing. Either that or you're a blind nuthugger.

Well, I've got to admit, although Guzman is great at posing standing up, Arthur is the master of posing lying down. Here's some of his best work:

This content is protected

 

I've only read the last page of this so I don't know what's been said in this thread. All I've got to say is the last time I saw AAA was on the undercard of Macca V Braithwaite (at the venue) and he didn't look all that. The last time I saw Guzman was on Sky, he looked slick but a bit lazy and powder puff.

 

Harrison and AAA are leagues apart.

 

What is the latest on Harrison? Last I saw Warren was suggesting the BBBC should reinstate his license.

 

This man looks to have good genetics.

Based on this picture, Guzman TKO 2, 3 , 1 or 4 (in order of likely hood) Arthur.

 

I don't know. You'd have to really struggle to miss a chin like that.

 

atsch Please tell me your taking the ****!

 

You think Arthur is the more attractive specimen, then?:think