Guzman vs Funeka round by round

Discussion in 'World Boxing Forum' started by elmaldito, Nov 28, 2009.


  1. pauliemayweathe

    pauliemayweathe Boxing Junkie Full Member

    12,995
    0
    Dec 27, 2007
    it won't be a bad dec cuz there is no way andrade can outpoint bute even in his andrade's backyard
     
  2. JMotrain

    JMotrain Boxing Junkie Full Member

    8,682
    2,621
    Sep 30, 2005
    Yeah he thinks Chavez beat Whitaker :lol::lol::lol::lol::lol::lol:
     
  3. truushot

    truushot Well-Known Member Full Member

    2,320
    1
    Jun 21, 2009
    1. Guzman 10-9
    2. Guzman 10-9
    3. Funeka 10-9 (could you give it to Guzman?)
    4 Guzman 10-9
    5. Funeka 10-9
    6. Funeka 10-9
    7. Guzman 10-9
    8. Funeka 10-9
    9. Funeka 10-9
    10. Funeka 10-9
    11. Funeka 10-9
    12. Funeka 10-9 (maybe you can give it to Guzman for the effort)

    Damn I just can't get to a draw.

    Glad on the money end of it...
     
  4. kopter

    kopter New Member Full Member

    94
    0
    Nov 26, 2009
    We'Re three here and all agree with you. at worst 7-5.
     
  5. pauliemayweathe

    pauliemayweathe Boxing Junkie Full Member

    12,995
    0
    Dec 27, 2007
    114-114 114-114 116-112 (obviously Funeka)
     
  6. JMotrain

    JMotrain Boxing Junkie Full Member

    8,682
    2,621
    Sep 30, 2005
    I had it 9-3 Funeka. You can MAYBE give Guzman the last round, but he only won 4 rounds AT BEST.
     
  7. Maxime

    Maxime Sweet Science Full Member

    8,957
    109
    Jul 19, 2004
    Scores are:
    116-112 Funeka
    114-114
    114-114
     
  8. truushot

    truushot Well-Known Member Full Member

    2,320
    1
    Jun 21, 2009

    Actually his analysis wasn't that far off.

    Remember watch the ****ing fights without the sound. Funeka was winning but Lewis and Kellerman where sucking his dick.
     
  9. maracho

    maracho Boxing Addict Full Member

    4,137
    1
    Mar 17, 2007
    Incompetence to fathom the possible social/political repercussions but corruption was also a major factor here cause even a five-year-old new who won that fight
     
  10. divac

    divac Loyal Member Full Member

    31,154
    2,108
    Jul 24, 2004

    There were two halves in the fight clown......

    .....the first half won by Guzman, and the second half dominated by Funeka......there is absolutely nothing wrong with how I scored the fight......one of the very few here that does not pay attention to how the commentators are scoring it......



    Funeka won imo, and thats proper!!!!:deal:deal:deal:deal:yep
     
  11. Barber-ian

    Barber-ian Active Member Full Member

    1,234
    1
    May 24, 2008
    That couldn't be more wrong.
     
  12. divac

    divac Loyal Member Full Member

    31,154
    2,108
    Jul 24, 2004
    :good

    Unfortunately 90% of the forum rely on commentators to let them know who should be up on the scorecards.
     
  13. Maxime

    Maxime Sweet Science Full Member

    8,957
    109
    Jul 19, 2004
    I don't why there would be corruption. What is there to gain for Interbox and Canadian boxing? They have nothing to do with Guzman.
     
  14. janeschicken

    janeschicken hard work! deadicayshin! Full Member

    20,570
    19
    Nov 10, 2007
    Read his ****ing post again -- he had Guzman WINNING -- Which is ****ing unbelievable and inexcusable.
     
  15. truushot

    truushot Well-Known Member Full Member

    2,320
    1
    Jun 21, 2009
    Yes again your analysis was good.

    Could have had Guzman winning the first 5 rounds, picks up the 12th and gets the draw.

    I don't buy it, but watching on the tv and from ring side are 2 totally different things.