H2H: Macho Camacho VS Mayweather, Jr.

Discussion in 'World Boxing Forum' started by Boxed Ears, Oct 28, 2009.


  1. Boxed Ears

    Boxed Ears this my daddy's account (RIP daddy) Full Member

    56,545
    11,059
    Jul 28, 2009
    Going with Mayweather, I can see. I favor him a little bit myself in this match, but to say you don't see Camacho as an elite fighter really boggles my mind. Four-time major world titlist in three different weight classes. I've never heard anyone dispute that he was elite. If he weren't still fighting at forty-seven, I think he'd have been in the HOF by now.
     
  2. frankenfrank

    frankenfrank Boxing Junkie Full Member

    13,965
    68
    Aug 18, 2009
    i never voted for this :

    Equal chances-very good match-up, maybe a draw.


    not by mistake. not by intention.

    someone did something with my account.

    i voted floyd UD.
    haugen outpointed camacho , why wouldn't floyd ? :huh
     
  3. Boxed Ears

    Boxed Ears this my daddy's account (RIP daddy) Full Member

    56,545
    11,059
    Jul 28, 2009
    If you'd seen that fight, you'd know Camacho got robbed, in the first place. There was a bizarre point deduction and Haugen got a gift decision. And Camacho immediately avenged it. Additionally, Haugen was a three-time, two-weight class world champion when all was said and done, so it's not like he was some crap-fighter. That's all unnecessary to say because of the fact that your logic there is faulty to begin with. With that logic, you could say that if Max Schmeling knocked out Joe Louis and Max Baer knocked out Max Schmeling, than why wouldn't Max Baer be able to knock out Joe Louis too? If that's how you reason things out, it's irrational.