Hagler or Hopkins??

Discussion in 'World Boxing Forum' started by hoopsman, Aug 31, 2010.


  1. itrymariti

    itrymariti CaƱas! Full Member

    13,728
    47
    Sep 6, 2008
    How dare you you ****ing cheeky ****, this chump would be lucky to last a round with Hagler, Hagler KO1, Hagler was a beast in his prime unhittable unstoppable and from a different breed of fighters, Hopkin's would be lucky to be top 10 in Haglers era, Sibson beat's him easy
     
  2. Kingkazim

    Kingkazim Boxing Addict Full Member

    5,806
    12
    Aug 26, 2009
    So much Hopkins hate on this board.
     
  3. JMP

    JMP Champion Full Member

    18,768
    21
    Dec 5, 2007
    This is a funny post. One of the more laugh-inducing ones I've read.
     
  4. crimson

    crimson Boxing Addict banned

    5,899
    0
    Dec 8, 2009
    Do you read your own post and ask "Did that make any sense?".

    I would assume no.
     
  5. Marnoff

    Marnoff Obsessed with Boxing Full Member

    25,227
    27
    Feb 14, 2006
    I'll take Hopkins on points.
     
  6. FROST

    FROST Boxing Addict Full Member

    4,529
    77
    May 3, 2006
    good analysis. Hagler UD
     
  7. Montezuma

    Montezuma Mandibula de Cristal Full Member

    374
    29
    Jul 16, 2007
    I pick Marvin Hagler by a tough but unanimous decision. Hopkins is a great fighter with so many good attributes, he has a great chin, is intelligent, adaptable, has a proven track record against lefties and has great skill in neutralizing his opponents assets. Hagler will have to work hard to get this win but I can see him eventually asserting his will and outlanding Hoppo in the later rounds. Hagler, in his prime, was one of the most perfect fighter I have ever seen. It would be a great technical match however and I would want to be ringside.
     
  8. Thread Stealer

    Thread Stealer Loyal Member Full Member

    42,080
    3,672
    Jun 30, 2005
    I'll just do a copy-and-paste on a long post I did regarding B-Hop and Marvin a long time ago.

     
  9. Kingkazim

    Kingkazim Boxing Addict Full Member

    5,806
    12
    Aug 26, 2009
    ^^pretty good analysis

    edit: i wonder how hagler vs hopkins would of went had they fought at light heavy
     
  10. Sinew

    Sinew The Assassin Full Member

    5,125
    191
    Feb 7, 2005
    hagler via tko
     
  11. KOTF

    KOTF Bingooo Full Member

    13,448
    29
    Jun 2, 2009
  12. mike_bngs

    mike_bngs Active Member Full Member

    943
    2
    Nov 8, 2008
    Hopkins would turn it into a snorefest, could get exciting if Hagler can land some good shots. Would love to see B-hop being the man being pressed for once.
     
  13. booradley

    booradley Mean People Kick Ass! Full Member

    39,848
    16
    Aug 29, 2006
    All this "Haglar would kill him" blah-blah-blah is absurd. The 30 hour weigh in rule changed everything. Hopkins, Taylor, and Pavlik were all freaking HUGE compared to the guys who fought under the same day weigh in rule. All 3 would be light heavyweights in Haglar's era. Marvin never showed any inclination to go anywhere near any light heavyweight, and for good reasons. Haglar routinely weighed 157 or so on the day of the fight. If he fought under the 30 hour weigh in rule, he would fight at 154.
     
  14. Clinton

    Clinton Obsessed with Boxing Full Member

    20,273
    6,589
    Jan 22, 2009
    Pretty good analysis.I still like Marvin's jab,footwork and workrate to take a decision.
     
  15. Clinton

    Clinton Obsessed with Boxing Full Member

    20,273
    6,589
    Jan 22, 2009
    Most of B-Hops best wins were over smaller fighters.As far as Hagler's best victories are concerned,they include these natural middleweights:"Bad" Bennie Briscoe,Bobby "Boogaloo" Watts,Willie "the Worm" Monroe,Eugene "Cyclone" Hart and "Sugar" Ray Seales.