Hagler or Hopkins??

Discussion in 'World Boxing Forum' started by hoopsman, Aug 31, 2010.


  1. Clinton

    Clinton Obsessed with Boxing Full Member

    20,273
    6,589
    Jan 22, 2009
    Well put:good
     
  2. Marnoff

    Marnoff Obsessed with Boxing Full Member

    25,227
    27
    Feb 14, 2006
    No, the best wins people talk about with regard to Hagler were also over small guys. Hearns and Duran to name two.
     
  3. exumspate

    exumspate Well-Known Member Full Member

    2,471
    208
    May 6, 2010
    Watch Hopkins throw down and stomp the Puerto Rican flag in the middle of a jam packed Puerto Rican stadium before you pick Hagler too quickly...

    Close fight, edge Hagler...
     
  4. hoopsman

    hoopsman Boxing Addict Full Member

    6,610
    2,273
    Jul 24, 2005
    Who are you calling a ****, tough guy??
     
  5. Napoleon

    Napoleon Smokin' Full Member

    2,411
    44
    Sep 4, 2006

    Jesus Christ! :-(

    What the hell is wrong with some of the posters here? Even at 44 years old, when was Hopkins hurt or someone even came close to "killing" him. Hopkins is crafty, dirty, and has terrific defense.

    It would be a very close and ugly fight that Hagler has a higher chance of winning.
     
  6. kinglouie3

    kinglouie3 Member Full Member

    176
    2
    Aug 9, 2010
    Both Hagler and Hopkins were(are) great fighters with an array of physical tools that almost make me want to say they'd need 2 or 3 fights to decide which one was the better middleweight.

    That being said, I firmly believe the one advantage that Bernard Hopkins holds over Marvin Hagler is the ability to never get drawn into another fighters fight. Hagler on numerous occasions tried to beat fighters at "their" game. He tried to outbox Sugar Ray Leonard to no avail, he went to war with both Hearns and Mugabi when a tactical fight would have probably better suited him in the long run(as far as punishment is concerned), he tried to be slick vs. Duran and that almost failed him in a huge way.

    Hopkins never, ever bent to an opponents will. He always has a plan B and always seems to make his opponent uncomfortable in the ring. RJJ had his hands full with a very green B-Hop, Calzaghe looked like an amateur, Tito and Pavlik chased and chased and were cut down to size. Hopkins has controlled every fight he has ever been in with his fighting I.Q., I can't say the same for Hagler.

    IMO Hopkins is the much smarter fighter and would find a way to beat Hagler in a very ugly, yet skillful bout between 2 legends of the middleweight division. Hopkins 116-112, and Hagler thinks he got robbed.
     
  7. Jorodz

    Jorodz watching Gatti Ward 1... Full Member

    21,677
    52
    Sep 8, 2007
    hagler. cause he's better
     
  8. WatchfortheHook

    WatchfortheHook Boxing Addict Full Member

    5,944
    0
    Feb 24, 2010
    I think Hagler by close decision.
     
  9. Boxed Ears

    Boxed Ears this my daddy's account (RIP daddy) Full Member

    58,754
    13,946
    Jul 28, 2009
    Hagler...in the ugliest fight you'll ever want to see.
     
  10. Boxed Ears

    Boxed Ears this my daddy's account (RIP daddy) Full Member

    58,754
    13,946
    Jul 28, 2009
    :lol: It seems like the last ten comments I've read of yours have been these precious gems of sarcasm.
     
  11. Farmboxer

    Farmboxer VIP Member Full Member

    86,105
    4,100
    Jul 19, 2004
  12. hussleman

    hussleman Boxing Junkie Full Member

    7,976
    18
    Jun 14, 2006
    This is a very interesting match-up that could go either way.