Hagler v Leonard Thoughts?

and if anyone wants to see how a title is lifted from the champion, I suggest they watch Richard Sandoval-Jeff Chandler, Hagler-Minter, or Foreman-Frazier

 

I had it to Hagler by 1 point, not fussed about it going to Leonard though as their are plenty of rounds he has a good argument for. I do believe Leonard won more clear rounds than Hagler did with a few close to call though. Its always highly debatable and imo is a pretty horrible fight to score. That being said these days any fight that is relatively close will be called a robbery, this is one of them but no matter who you favour the word robbery should never be used here.

 

The supposed best fighter on the planet beaten by a blown up,coke-sniffing imposter of the man he once was - and people wonder why Miss Marvis is so bitter? That's enough to turn any proud man into a hermit that gets smashed on drugs and alcohol and then intimidates his wife to the point where she has to file a restraining order against him.

Quite possibly the only original post in an unbelievably redundant and recycled topic.



I personally gave Leonard every round.

The only organization willing to sanction this title match was the WBC,and they had completely gotten rid of the 15 round fights by this point.


People continually bring this up and are either unaware or forget the fact that Hagler's previous two fights were twelve round fights.