Hagler vs prime Hopkins at 160

Discussion in 'World Boxing Forum' started by EL-MATADOR, Oct 10, 2008.


  1. EL-MATADOR

    EL-MATADOR Boxing Junkie Full Member

    12,760
    2
    Sep 25, 2008
    who wins this one and why?
     
  2. King Dan

    King Dan Golovkin Full Member

    3,589
    1
    Feb 24, 2005
  3. EL-MATADOR

    EL-MATADOR Boxing Junkie Full Member

    12,760
    2
    Sep 25, 2008
    i say hagler by close but clear UD in a rough tough fight
     
  4. Bill Butcher

    Bill Butcher Erik`El Terrible`Morales Full Member

    28,518
    82
    Sep 3, 2007
    I agree with this.

    Hopkins usually gets the better of opponents by using the rough stuff but vs MMH he would be in with a guy who was as rough & tough & skillfull & determined as they can come at 160 lbs.

    It wouldnt be easy but I think Hagler`s strength inside wins in the end.
     
  5. jaffay

    jaffay New Orleans Hornets Full Member

    3,980
    18
    Jun 24, 2007
    Hopkins is too big for Hagler
     
  6. PH|LLA

    PH|LLA VIP Member Full Member

    79,438
    2,646
    Feb 1, 2007
    Hopkins close UD.

    He would outsmart and frustrate Hagler with his footwork and timing.
     
  7. CarlesX7

    CarlesX7 Shit got real! Full Member

    13,209
    291
    Sep 23, 2008
    It seems there is no draw verdict in the new boxing rules :think
     
  8. the cobra

    the cobra Awesomeizationism! Full Member

    12,028
    106
    Jun 30, 2008
    They both were so complete at their best that it's hard to call.

    I think Hopkins' edges Hagler in footwork, defense, counterpunching, and his height and reach will help him, Hagler hit harder and had the better jab. Personally, I see the advantages that Hopkins holds will mean more in a prime for prime fight than those that Hagler has. Also, I see Hopkins as the overall better ring general, a bit better at controlling range and possibly pace.

    Very close either way, and given that Hagler would more than likely be aggressive, that could swing it his way, but I personally lean towards hopkins.

    No one is going to get flat out beat in this fight, both were overall too complete at their best for that to happen.
     
  9. JM22

    JM22 Obsessed with Boxing Full Member

    16,487
    5
    Jun 5, 2008
    Good one BUT B-HOP make's EVERYBODY look bad:yep Even at this stage.It could go both way's.
     
  10. Sweet Pea

    Sweet Pea Obsessed with Boxing banned

    27,199
    93
    Dec 26, 2007
    Hagler would land flush just as often as Hopkins would. Hagler in his prime was an excellent boxer-puncher as well, with excellent ring movement and countering skills of his own. You've mosty likely only seen the latter version of Hagler whose style changed up due to deteriorating physical ability.
     
  11. Sweet Pea

    Sweet Pea Obsessed with Boxing banned

    27,199
    93
    Dec 26, 2007
    :rofl @ the person who chose Hopkins by KO. Neither fighter is being stopped in this one.
     
  12. the cobra

    the cobra Awesomeizationism! Full Member

    12,028
    106
    Jun 30, 2008
    Hopkins made 160 for 14 years and very often weighed in under the limit, he hardly ever rehydrated over 164 during his middleweight reign according to HBO's unofficial weigh-ins I believe.

    Hopkins was a big middleweight with his frame, but he was a true middleweight. But yes, he is bigger than Hagler, although apart from height and reach, I don't see that as playing a big role.
     
  13. JM22

    JM22 Obsessed with Boxing Full Member

    16,487
    5
    Jun 5, 2008
    Yep very true BUT this is BOXING anything can happen!!!

    But yeah i agree dont see nobody getting stop.
     
  14. mexican legend

    mexican legend MVP! Full Member

    17,356
    1
    Jul 19, 2008
  15. sitiyzal

    sitiyzal ................. Full Member

    4,387
    2
    Sep 25, 2008
    At least one voter is officially insane.