Hagler vs prime Hopkins at 160

Discussion in 'World Boxing Forum' started by EL-MATADOR, Oct 10, 2008.


  1. JM22

    JM22 Obsessed with Boxing Full Member

    16,487
    5
    Jun 5, 2008
    This content is protected
     
  2. CASH_718

    CASH_718 "You ****ed Healy?" Full Member

    18,614
    8
    Apr 10, 2005
    Hagler wins a SD in a fight that could have went either way but Hagler gets the nod for being a little more active and landing the harder shots.
     
  3. Koa

    Koa Boxing Addict Full Member

    4,380
    3
    Sep 24, 2004
    I like this analysis. Hopkins does everything he can to keep his opponents off balance, and from moving foward. The way to beat Hagler historically wasn't to keep him from moving fowards, it was to be able to fight him in spots, fight off the back foot and move to limit the damage he inflicted. Hopkins is a decent puncher who is able to disguise loaded punches and draw opponents into those shots when he is at his best. But, we are also talking about Hagler, a guy who was able to eat Hearns' and Ray Leonards best shots and keep coming foward.

    Hopkins has superb footwork, but he isn't at his best unless he can keep the fight toe to toe, or get his opponent moving backwards. All things considered, I still think it would be a close close fight. Hopkins makes great fighters look ordinary by controlling the pace of the fight with clinches and trickery. Slowing Hagler this way? I'd be very interested to see how well it works.
     
  4. USboxer1981

    USboxer1981 The Real Def. MVP Full Member

    9,873
    2
    Nov 9, 2007
    Who Put Hopkins By Ko?????????
     
  5. birddog

    birddog Active Member Full Member

    1,012
    1
    Dec 1, 2005
    Good stuff by you and fluxstuff.

    Hagler was a very good boxer puncher (I think many here underestimate him, and see the Hagler of later in his career), with an underrated defense especially in his prime (say 78-82/83), besides having a steel chin. He also had a high punch rate for a middle.

    I think Hags wins a decision in 4 out of 5 fights. having said that, it's hard to compare the two I think, as I think their competition was very different. I'm obviously a Hagler fan but subjective. I think hagler fought a higher quality of opposition, both coming up and as Champ.

    Hagler also had the same reach as Bernard, who is 4" taller. not that it matters
     
  6. EL-MATADOR

    EL-MATADOR Boxing Junkie Full Member

    12,760
    2
    Sep 25, 2008
    someone who has no clue what they r talkin bout thats who
     
  7. Executioner

    Executioner Boxing Addict Full Member

    3,587
    8
    Apr 22, 2006
    Me
     
  8. LiamE

    LiamE Boxing Addict Full Member

    3,391
    3
    Nov 3, 2007
    Hopkins would not have a reach advantage over Hagler.
     
  9. Sweet Pea

    Sweet Pea Obsessed with Boxing banned

    27,199
    93
    Dec 26, 2007
    Seriously?
     
  10. Executioner

    Executioner Boxing Addict Full Member

    3,587
    8
    Apr 22, 2006
    :nono
     
  11. LiamE

    LiamE Boxing Addict Full Member

    3,391
    3
    Nov 3, 2007
    Delete account. Go watch netball.
     
  12. Sweet Pea

    Sweet Pea Obsessed with Boxing banned

    27,199
    93
    Dec 26, 2007
    Hagler at his tactical best. Brilliant finish:

    [yt]bzoSDSlSE6s[/yt]
     
  13. JonOli

    JonOli Obsessed with Boxing Full Member

    16,352
    2
    Nov 4, 2007
  14. USboxer1981

    USboxer1981 The Real Def. MVP Full Member

    9,873
    2
    Nov 9, 2007
    I am glad those ropes were loose, that was sick
     
  15. Robbi

    Robbi Marvelous Full Member

    15,217
    170
    Jul 23, 2004
    Hopkins, close decision.