Hagler vs prime Hopkins at 160

Discussion in 'World Boxing Forum' started by EL-MATADOR, Oct 10, 2008.


  1. Hatesrats

    Hatesrats "I'm NOT Suprised..." Full Member

    60,376
    241
    Sep 28, 2007
  2. birddog

    birddog Active Member Full Member

    1,012
    1
    Dec 1, 2005
    Gil Clancy was wrong, he said Hamani was correct in moving left away from Marv's straight left. While moving left is correct when facing a true southpaw, Marv was a righty who fought southpaw. Clancy was wrong.
     
  3. headers14

    headers14 Member Full Member

    235
    1
    Jun 28, 2008
    Hagler by a very close Ud
     
  4. bernie4366

    bernie4366 Boxing Junkie Full Member

    13,681
    22
    Aug 29, 2006
    Hagler couldn't even beat great welterweights, how the hell is he going to beat a great middleweight like Hopkins?
     
  5. EL-MATADOR

    EL-MATADOR Boxing Junkie Full Member

    12,760
    2
    Sep 25, 2008
    you're insane
     
  6. Sweet Pea

    Sweet Pea Obsessed with Boxing banned

    27,199
    93
    Dec 26, 2007
    He beat Hearns, Duran, and arguably Leonard, all great WW's and very capable MW's.

    His MW resume is easily better than Hopkins's, as are his wins over smaller opponents like the aforementioned and Mugabi. I could easily pose the same question about Hopkins, as he's never beaten a great MW himself. In fact, the only one he ever faced beat him quite easily.

    In other words, learn something before talking out of your ass.
     
  7. CASH_718

    CASH_718 "You ****ed Healy?" Full Member

    18,614
    8
    Apr 10, 2005
    That's not true. Now Hopkins don't like that because he can't keep the pace but when he was younge he was at his best vs opponents that came at him.
     
  8. EL-MATADOR

    EL-MATADOR Boxing Junkie Full Member

    12,760
    2
    Sep 25, 2008
    none of those opponents were anything like hagler
     
  9. CASH_718

    CASH_718 "You ****ed Healy?" Full Member

    18,614
    8
    Apr 10, 2005
    This fight would be close but Calzaghe vs Hagler wouldn't be. Calzaghe wins a wide UD.:roll:

    :nut
     
  10. Sweet Pea

    Sweet Pea Obsessed with Boxing banned

    27,199
    93
    Dec 26, 2007
    Hagler was not a pressure fighter. I do however, think this would gradually turn itself into a close range fight, with Hagler taking the initiative in order to gain the edge after they felt each other out and boxed for a few rounds in the center of the ring.
     
  11. CASH_718

    CASH_718 "You ****ed Healy?" Full Member

    18,614
    8
    Apr 10, 2005
    None of Hagler's opponent were like Hopkins..... What's your point?
     
  12. CASH_718

    CASH_718 "You ****ed Healy?" Full Member

    18,614
    8
    Apr 10, 2005
    Hagler would have to pressure him. They are both great boxers but Hopkins would get the better of him in a box off.
     
  13. Sweet Pea

    Sweet Pea Obsessed with Boxing banned

    27,199
    93
    Dec 26, 2007
    I'm not sure of that, but it would probably be in his best interest to make it a close range affair, as Hopkins was more comfortable at a distance at any point in his career, though he could take care of himself well under pressure. Still, with Hagler's skills, I think he'd get the better of the bout at close to mid range, and his jab and ability to switch hit would be an issue for Hopkins at long range as well.
     
  14. CASH_718

    CASH_718 "You ****ed Healy?" Full Member

    18,614
    8
    Apr 10, 2005
    Another thing I think it would better for Hagler to fight as a southpaw because he's simple fights better that way but Hopkins is really good against southpaws and that right hand would be there all night for him.
     
  15. Sweet Pea

    Sweet Pea Obsessed with Boxing banned

    27,199
    93
    Dec 26, 2007
    That's why I believe he'd have attempted to switch it up a bit to throw Hopkins off.