Hamed (Ingle Gym) vs Pacquiao at Featherweight

Prince was 46th hardest puncher of ALL TIME, and the hardest hitting featherweight of all time by the looks of that list.

Ring Magazine (http://boxing.about.com/od/history/a/ring_punchers.htm)
Thats not bad proof

 

Pacquiao starches him within 3 rounds.

 

a guy never ko'd or dopped in his career (only when off balance, never past a 2 count)?

 

Yea But Pacquiao ko'd a guy called 3K Battery, it must count for something

 

p4p i would have hamed a lot higher than lennox lewis

 

Ham head was a joke. The moment he stepped up, he got schooled and humiliated. He ran away with his tail between his legs after MAB *****-slapped him. He had no heart or the will to win...a complete opposite of Pac.

People are delusional to think he can hang with an elite fighter. He was a mental midget like Judah, except Judah was man enough to keep fighting. If Pac was raw at 126, Hamed was rotten. He wish he had half the skills of Pac.

Pac by KO.

 

the prince was perfectly tailor made for the featherweight version of pacquiao. hamed's power fighting backwards is freakishly powerful for a guy his size that any come forward featherweight in the history of the sport fought they would get ktfo against hamed ....FACT

 

This fight would be an absolute

This content is protected

.

Take a guy with no guard, no fundamentals, and basically no concept of how to defend himself in a boxing ring - Hamed.

Take a guy with extreme power, speed, explosiveness, workrate, stamina and ferocity - Pacquiao.

Pacquiao wouldn't stop thrashing Hamed's skull until it looked like a smashed melon.

This would be even more one-sided than Pacquiao vs Barrera 1 and Barrera vs Hamed would suggest! :deal

 

if they update this **** where would you think pac will be on this list?
****ing dickheadatsch

 

nice choice of words. if i was to compare a hieght of 2 people, and i said "this guy is taller". i dont get somebody coming back and saying. "yeah but the other guy was only 3 inches shorter why didn't you mention that, huh?" as if i hadn't realized.atsch

ok i think hamed had a better chin than manny, i think he has more one punch power than manny in both hands, and i think his punches form a-b are faster than mannys.

mab got stuck behind his guard and couldn't get out the way. morales didn't play ball backed him up and let him swing. in the rematch he tried to back him up but ended up just trying to chin him. and he is finished as a fighter hamed doesnt stick around and isnt going to get outboxed by manny, manny has to swarm and throw to get anywhere in this fight. which is exactly what hamed has always benefited from. especially somebody who isn't gunshy and a poor defence.

 

That is one of the worst comparisons I've ever read.I'm shocked that you would even write that downatsch.Whatever.My point was that Hamed fans love to brag about Hamed's speed and punching power without ever giving any kind of credit to any opponent like MAB(and imaginary opponents like Pac as an example).And the next paragraph,you wrote,"I think...,I think...,I think...,"without any definitive proof.In reality,Pac at featherweight in much better than anyone Hamed ever beat-on a different level in fact.His quickness,power and chin at 126 are brilliant even though he wasn't the greatest technically sound featherweight(albeit more technically sound than the technically deficient Hamed).Hamed's deficiencies would be exposed by the brilliant Pac as Manny wouldn't get psyched out and lose his focus as so many far lesser Hamed opponents did.I mean absolutely CHINLESS(****ING CHINLESS)and inferior to Pac Augie Sanchez managed to trouble Hamed for 4 rounds until he most predictably fell.Maybe you're of the ilk that claims Sanchez was one of Hamed's best victories because he decisioned Mayweather in the amateurs.Hell,maybe he is.

 

Hamed was tailored made for Manny Pacquiao as Hamed was even more technically deficient than Pac.Pac's longer reach,quickness,power,workrate,chin and ferocity would be something Hamed had never seen before.NEVER.And his composure would have rivaled Barrera's,another thing Hamed,the psyched out artist,wouldn't have seen before-combined with Pac's other great skills.These realities wouldn't bode well for a fighter that NEVER beat an elite in his career.FACT.

 

.REALLY???Most people rate Lewis top 10 and many rate him top 5 ATG heavyweight ever.Some even rate him 1 or 2.I don't know your ranking system or where you rate Lewis,but hamed never beat an elite and got the **** out of the sport just 1 fight removed after receiving a boxing lesson against an elite.

 

This is ridiculous. Pacquiao wins by TKO. He would whack Hamed from post to post.

Most powerful featherweight ever? Based on what? Did Hamed knockout a prime iron chinned fighter instead of some bum fighting on Hamed's turf? Did he knockout an elite fighter?

 

Cool.If you want to go by the Ring's list as if it were the Bible,fine.That's your business.But here's what the list-the list that you brought up-has:
#5 Sandy Saddler
#12 Ruben Olivares
#13 Wilfredo Gomez
#20 Alexis Arguello
#26 Danny Lopez
So much for Hamed being "...the hardest hitting featherweight of all time by the looks of that list...."You really don't know much about boxing,do you?Remember when you wrote that I should watch another sport?Well if the shoe fits.....