Hamed Saying Brook Stops GGG In The 11 Round

Maybe it's Sheffield love.. personally I think it'll be on the other scale.. round 2 or something..

 

re verse etc

 

Nothing wrong with that. Boxing and good food go well together. In Maryland you can have a steak and watch live boxing. That's whats up!

 

Hamed didn't know what was so special about Barrera either. What's so great about a guy who's not very flashy and is just a solid textbook fighter? Some people just don't see it.

 

Nothing wrong with it except when you eat it like Hamed. I see Hamed and I think "oh **** that can happen too. That can't be healthy, look at how fat that guy is. Oh my god he is going to die".

 

Gotta support his fellow countrymen, although he's dead wrong on this one...

 

Is that Nazeem Hamed?

 

Now the boxer doesn't know what he's talking about. When Murray was talking the other day they dick rode Murray, not Noseem Fatmed is clueless about the sport. How the **** would any of you clowns know that? Dick riders.

 

The difference being that Murray was informative and demonstrated what he meant while Hamed murmered and stuttered after long pauses without actually articulating anything. One was also in the ring with GGG and the other spent his career relying on his physical gifts and ignoring the basics of boxing which led to his spiraling downfall.

 

Hamed is wrong...................

 

I perfectly understood Hamed and he knows what it took to get into that ring period. WTF are you talking about? Lol. The rest of what you said was a trash thought. Trying to discredit Hamed and justify Murray lmao. If anyone has a right to give an opinion it's Hamed. Opinions are opinions-they aren't fact. Of course Murray isn't going to think that a career WW will beat GG.

 

It was a fairly clear post with logical reasons that weren't littered with passive aggressive remarks. I gave two solid reasons for why Murray's opinion was taken seriously and two solid reasons why Hameds opinion has been taken with a grain of salt. You can get defensive over it all you want but truth be told I'd take Hameds opinion over yours despite my previous stance on the subject.

 

First off, get off of GG's dick. Second, Hamed said what he said. If you have a problem with his opinion don't take it up with me. Take it up with him. And lastly, "solid reasons", "grain of salt", "truth be told" and "defensive" are words that don't need to be associated with two fighters giving their opinion on GG. And leave me and you out of this.

 

This is awkward. Not even sure how to respond to this. I'd have to go over every individual thing you said one by one since you clearly misinterpreted everything I said. Seriously, Your responses aren't even coherent. I guess I'll cover a few things though. No way am I going to respond to everything. "First off". My post history isn't littered with dick riding of any fighter. I have a lot of posts related to GGG but why wouldn't I? He's the most discussed fighter on these forums. You'll find that none of these posts are praising him along other middleweight greats like Hagler or Monzon. Nor are they shilling GGG's opponents. They also aren't posts that exists in this thread so I'm not sure why you brought it up. "Second" Hamed does have his opinions. So does Murray. You wanted to know why people took Murrays opinions more seriously and I gave you 4 solid reasons. What I didn't do was give you my opinion on the matter. I'm sure you're just grouping me in with everyone else you deem as a GGG nuthugger and mashing all of our opinions together as one collective entity though. Shockmaster was pretty good at that. It's how he deluded himself into thinking he was making an actual argument in most of his threads."Solid Reasons" wasn't a phrase I used to discuss Murray and Hamed, it was to discuss how other people view their opinions. Separate those two things and you'll probably understand my posts a bit better. "Truth be told", and "defensive" are terms that everyone is in their right to use when making an opinion on a fighter. I don't see your problem with it. But then again your comment doesn't make any sense once again. Those phrases were about you, not Hamed or Murray. Playing the "Boxers actually box and their opinions are on a plain of existence that forum lurkers can't criticize" card doesn't even apply here.

With the slim chance you actually read all of this I got some advice. I know it's just a lowly boxing forum and none of this really matters but when you go on a tirade and let loose it really effects your mental state of being. Try and hold back some when you post. I promise your arguments will sway a lot more people if you try and be a bit more objective.