Hamed V Hatton

Discussion in 'World Boxing Forum' started by Check_Hook, Jan 4, 2011.


  1. garymcfall

    garymcfall Well-Known Member Full Member

    1,526
    10
    May 19, 2007
    Should have been Hamed, but its Hatton, Hattons resume is much better, but Hamed should have achieved more than he did.
     
  2. AnthonyW

    AnthonyW ESB Official Gif Poster Full Member

    2,732
    21
    Dec 22, 2009
    :deal
     
  3. neemo2357

    neemo2357 Active Member Full Member

    580
    1
    Oct 20, 2009
    fighting or eating contest?

    Hamed for me. P4p more power, elusive, unorthodox, nightmare matchup when he could be arsed.
     
  4. prideofvbeach

    prideofvbeach Top 10 Pound-For-Pound Full Member

    2,557
    0
    Sep 26, 2007
    They're the same kind of fighter, but Ricky hits harder so Hatton then.
     
  5. AnthonyW

    AnthonyW ESB Official Gif Poster Full Member

    2,732
    21
    Dec 22, 2009
    Erm...no they are not.
     
  6. fletch2069

    fletch2069 Member Full Member

    451
    0
    Jun 21, 2008
  7. BEASTLY PEPE

    BEASTLY PEPE Guest

    Remind me what greats Hamed beat? Pretty sure the only great he faced was Barrera and he got schooled then retired after facing the realization that he would have to fight Pac, Morales and Barrera. Fat leprechaun.

    Ricky Hatton beat Tsyzu a great /endthread.
     
  8. fidds

    fidds Boxing Addict Full Member

    4,672
    106
    Mar 15, 2006

    :rofl

    Same kind of fighter :patsch:lol:

    You seriously either don't know or have never watched hatton or hamed nothing could be further from the truth. There styles are absolutely pole apart :rofl

    hamed was one of a kind
     
  9. Check_Hook

    Check_Hook Well-Known Member Full Member

    2,478
    3
    Jul 23, 2010
    :deal
    Great post, the hate hatton gets is a discrace
     
  10. Vitor Belfort

    Vitor Belfort Obsessed with Boxing Full Member

    18,334
    3
    Dec 17, 2008
  11. Speedtron

    Speedtron Active Member Full Member

    572
    0
    May 9, 2010
    Definitively Hatton!!! Hatton has far better resume than Hamed. Hamed might have beaten Hatton H2H, but Hatton accomplished more.
     
  12. oli

    oli Boxing Junkie banned

    8,804
    1
    Mar 11, 2010
    :lol: If i had a quid for everytime i heard some pea brain joke say that id be a millionaire.

    You've just proved my point. Hes more respected for who he lost to rather than who he actually beat:lol:.

    I prefer to think of it as Hatton was so overated into himself and others thinking he could beat 2 guys whom he had NO bussiness being in the ring with.:lol:
     
  13. Azzer85

    Azzer85 Obsessed with Boxing Full Member

    28,283
    469
    Mar 13, 2010
    Hamed could have been an ATG along the same level as Morales and Mab, but he messed his career up. Hatton on the other hand is a HOF but no ATG.
    Naz would be a phenom in any era, Hatton wouldnt (apart from his own)

    Naz was undefeated and top of his division for a good few years until his skills started slipping and he ran into ATG Barerra. Hatton you could argue was pretty much in his prime when he lost to PacMan.

    H2H is difficult because Hatton is a much bigger man and hits quite hard, however if anyone could "Pacquiao" Hatton under 147...it would be Hamed.

    Both men are terribly underrated unfortunately.
     
  14. Peabob

    Peabob Member Full Member

    474
    0
    Sep 7, 2008
    Hamed is a total bum. Amazing fighter, who got beaten once and cried ever since. Now spends his days sniffing after Amir Khan like he's in the rign with him. He's a ****ing embarrassment to boxing. For all the showmanship and flare he turned out to be a powder puff. Never got anywhere near his potential. The Tin Man had more heart.
     
  15. Colpolite

    Colpolite Guest

    Hatton

    Hamed is a quitter