Hamed V Hatton

Those voting for Hamed are more concerned about losses

whilst

Those voting for Hatton are more concerned about wins

 

How about a 96% winning rate in 47 pro fights, and a 68% KO rate at a world class level?

The guy lost two fights, to the two best fighters in the game and everyone gives him ****.

Then, douche bags like you seem to forget the things he accomplished:

Two division world champion

* WBC, WBA World welterweight title

* WBA Super, IBO, IBF, WBU World light welterweight title

Regional titles:
* WBA, WBO, WBC Inter-Continental light welterweight title

* The Ring magazine's World Light Welterweight Champion

* Won the Lonsdale belt, BBBofC title

Awards:
* 2005 Ring Magazine Fighter of the Year: Hatton is the first British boxer to receive the award since its inception in 1928


* 2005 ESPN.com Fighter of the Year

Amateur Record: 73-7
* 1996 Junior World Championships Light Welterweight Bronze Medalist
* ABA National Champion Light Welterweight 1997
* ABA National Junior Champion (Class A) Light Welterweight 1995,1996
* ABA National Junior Champion (Class B) Light Welterweight 1997
* ABA National Junior Champion (Class C) Light Welterweight 1994


Then we have Hamed:


97% win rate and 83% KO rate in 37 pro fights.

Single Division World Champ: WBC, WBO, IBO, IBF Featherweight World Champ

Regional Titles: WBC International Super Bantamweight, EBU bantamweight title

Prince Naseem Hamed never held the Lonsdale belt. It is alleged that Naseem Hamed tried to buy a Lonsdale belt at auction.

Amateur Record 62-5


------------------------------------


So, lets recap.

More accomplished title winner? Hatton

Better resume? Hatton

More accomplished amateur career? Hatton

Toe to toe? Hatton

Crazy fans? Hatton

Your boxing knowledge? Total ****

:hi: